Corporate Bitcoin allocation requires careful planning: How to scientifically structure treasury assets

2025-12-28 05:40:10

【Crypto World】 Companies incorporating Bitcoin into their treasuries, how much should they allocate? Industry experts suggest keeping it between 1% and 5% for safety. How to buy? No need to go all-in at once; staggered purchases and fixed-amount investments often yield better results. But if this investment exceeds 2% of the company’s liquid assets, it’s better to wait and see when the funding for Bitcoin ETFs shifts, then choose the right time to enter.

Recently, the market has indeed been a bit chaotic. Gold and silver are rising, while crypto assets are correcting, and Bitcoin even dropped to $87,000. What does this really mean? Some say it’s a sign of a bear market, while others believe it’s just a normal pullback within a long-term bull market. Market opinions vary quite a bit.

An interesting phenomenon: Bitcoin’s sensitivity to central bank policies is often higher than its response to inflation data itself. So next, the focus should be on the Federal Reserve—whether they are really shifting from a high-interest-rate era to rate cuts. This policy turning point could be very influential on Bitcoin’s price movement.

BTC0,09%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

MEVvictim

· 17h ago

1%-5% allocation sounds stable, but when it comes to actual operation, it's easy to get soft. One misstep and you're out. ETF funding must be closely monitored, or you'll end up as the bagholder. The Federal Reserve is the real ticking time bomb; Bitcoin's movement entirely depends on their stance. After dropping so much from 87,000, should I buy now or wait? I'm so conflicted. Gold rises while crypto falls; this stark contrast is indeed a bit strange, feels like someone is dumping. Dollar-cost averaging is the right approach, but you need enough patience. Retail investors lack this the most.

View OriginalReply0

GasBandit

· 17h ago

1%-5% is a safe joke. I would have already gone all-in, and now I can only pray that the Federal Reserve doesn't cause any more trouble.

View OriginalReply0

CounterIndicator

· 17h ago

1%-5% is safe? I think these people just haven't seen a real all-in move. Talking casually, but when it drops to 2%, they just wait. Isn't that cowardice? $87,000 drop, and some people compare it to gold. I laughed. The Federal Reserve's issues have already been digested by Bitcoin long ago. Don't always think a policy turning point will save you.

View OriginalReply0

fren.eth

· 17h ago

1%-5% allocation still sounds a bit conservative; those with real guts have already jumped in. Staggered dollar-cost averaging is indeed fine, but at this point, what are we waiting for? Instead of watching ETF fund flows, it's better to keep an eye on the Federal Reserve's moves. Rate cuts will definitely trigger a surge. Gold rising while BTC moves inversely? That doesn't make sense. They should rise together.

View OriginalReply0

AirdropLicker

· 17h ago

1%-5% is enough, and you can also invest in batches. Companies should be more aggressive. Gold rises while BTC falls, isn't this just funds reallocating? Once the Federal Reserve takes action, everything will come back to life. 87,000 USD, what's there to fear? When the rate-cut cycle begins, it will definitely recover.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainHolmes

· 17h ago

The 1%-5% suggestion is a bit conservative; big companies have already jumped on board. --- The drop to 87,000 is really shocking, but it seems the Federal Reserve's moves are the key. --- Batch deployment is a solid approach; I just worry that corporate CFOs are still hesitating over whether to buy. --- Is the central bank's policy sensitivity higher than inflation data? That's the real truth of the market. --- Waiting for ETF capital flows to turn before entering? You might just miss another wave. --- Gold rises, Bitcoin falls—this situation is indeed abnormal; keep an eye on it. --- A 2% risk threshold is quite precise; corporate treasury allocations should still prioritize stability. --- It's good enough if a company can truly include Bitcoin in its treasury; most are still watching from the sidelines. --- The moment expectations of rate cuts emerge, it's time to pre-position. --- Going all-in or dollar-cost averaging—choosing the wrong one can be a huge pitfall.

View OriginalReply0

FlippedSignal

· 17h ago

1%-5% this suggestion sounds stable, but companies that really go all-in have already made a fortune Gold rising while BTC falls, this contrast is indeed outrageous, feels like the market is fighting The Federal Reserve is the biggest boss; as soon as a policy turning point appears, the market will change dramatically Let's wait and see the ETF funding situation; this statement is too cautious, the market won't wait At the 87,000 level, I am tempted, just waiting to see if the corporate sponsors dare to buy the dip

View OriginalReply0