Recently, many people have been complaining about the sluggish market and not knowing how to choose coins. But if you look closely, you'll notice that the capital flow across different sectors has already started to diverge—institutions are voting with real money, and these signals might be more reliable than any hype.
**Institutional Path in the SUI Ecosystem** From trading data, the 24-hour trading volume of the SUI ecosystem DEX has already surged to the hundreds of millions level, which is no small figure. More importantly, major players like leading asset management firms are submitting applications for spot ETFs, indicating that traditional capital liquidity is directly connecting. From an ecosystem perspective, new roadmaps are also continuously advancing. This growth logic doesn't rely entirely on project teams pumping prices but is driven by market voting with their feet. Every pullback might actually be institutions building positions.
**ASTER's Supply-side Pressure** This project has a unique approach—using most of its revenue to buy back and burn tokens, effectively reducing circulating supply. Additionally, it has partnered with Japan's SBI Holdings to issue a JPY stablecoin, which has a very clear supply and demand logic behind it. From a long-term holding perspective, this deflationary model can indeed address some traditional token dilution issues.
**AT's Community-Driven Approach** In the past 24 hours, it has surged by 50%, with high community enthusiasm, and a prize pool mechanism locking in users with 400,000 AT. Projects like this are often driven more by momentum and sentiment; riding the trend before it turns might be the most straightforward approach.
Currently, regulatory expectations for 2026 are changing, and large funds are accelerating their布局. The market has never been about stamina but about understanding the ecosystem development and managing positions. Do you prefer ecosystems with heavy institutional holdings or focus on community-driven short-term momentum?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LiquidationTherapist
· 17h ago
Institutions really do invest with real money, and hearing this kind of statement repeatedly has become common, but the 16 billion trading volume figure actually means something. If SUI's ETF application really gets approved this time, it will be a real blow.
---
Deflationary burning sounds great, but I'm just worried that in the end, it still can't escape the fate of project teams cashing out.
---
AT has risen 50% and the community is excited, but trend reversals often happen in an instant. Who catches the last wave this time will really depend on luck.
---
Instead of guessing what institutions are doing, it's better to see if your own position can withstand the next wave of correction.
---
The so-called ecological cognition is, in essence, a game of information gaps and gambling psychology.
---
Partnering with SBI to issue a Japanese Yen stablecoin sounds impressive, but no one can really say for sure whether this will actually come to fruition.
---
If a trading volume is high, people tend to think about institutional accumulation, but this logic is a bit too loose, everyone.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwich
· 17h ago
Institutions are building positions while we're bottom-fishing. This is the right way to open up, and SUI is stable this round.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 17h ago
I want to buy all the dips during institutional accumulation, but unfortunately, I have no bullets left.
View OriginalReply0
SpeakWithHatOn
· 17h ago
The logic behind institutional accumulation is indeed more reliable than just calling out trades, but for emotional markets like AT, you still have to bet on human nature.
View OriginalReply0
BankruptWorker
· 18h ago
Institutions' real money voting is indeed hardcore, but to be honest, I still trust projects like SUI that have underlying logic. With a trading volume of 16 billion, it's more comfortable to buy the dip during a correction than to chase the high now.
---
The buyback and burn mechanism of ASTER is pretty good, but the stability of the Japanese yen stablecoin is still a bit uncertain. It depends on how well the subsequent execution is carried out.
---
When AT rises by 50%, some people start to get excited. I don't engage in such emotional trading, as it's easy to catch the last falling knife.
---
Honestly, you need to understand your own risk tolerance. Institutional routes are stable but slow, community-driven projects are fast but riskier. I prefer the former, after all, bankrupt workers can't afford to keep tossing around.
---
A trading volume of 16 billion sounds impressive, but it depends on the depth of the market. Don't be fooled by the numbers.
---
Deflation mode sounds appealing, but when it comes to a dump, no mode can stop it. Supply and demand logic is useless in the face of panic.
Recently, many people have been complaining about the sluggish market and not knowing how to choose coins. But if you look closely, you'll notice that the capital flow across different sectors has already started to diverge—institutions are voting with real money, and these signals might be more reliable than any hype.
**Institutional Path in the SUI Ecosystem**
From trading data, the 24-hour trading volume of the SUI ecosystem DEX has already surged to the hundreds of millions level, which is no small figure. More importantly, major players like leading asset management firms are submitting applications for spot ETFs, indicating that traditional capital liquidity is directly connecting. From an ecosystem perspective, new roadmaps are also continuously advancing. This growth logic doesn't rely entirely on project teams pumping prices but is driven by market voting with their feet. Every pullback might actually be institutions building positions.
**ASTER's Supply-side Pressure**
This project has a unique approach—using most of its revenue to buy back and burn tokens, effectively reducing circulating supply. Additionally, it has partnered with Japan's SBI Holdings to issue a JPY stablecoin, which has a very clear supply and demand logic behind it. From a long-term holding perspective, this deflationary model can indeed address some traditional token dilution issues.
**AT's Community-Driven Approach**
In the past 24 hours, it has surged by 50%, with high community enthusiasm, and a prize pool mechanism locking in users with 400,000 AT. Projects like this are often driven more by momentum and sentiment; riding the trend before it turns might be the most straightforward approach.
Currently, regulatory expectations for 2026 are changing, and large funds are accelerating their布局. The market has never been about stamina but about understanding the ecosystem development and managing positions. Do you prefer ecosystems with heavy institutional holdings or focus on community-driven short-term momentum?