The Treasury has completed the destruction of 100 million UNI tokens, which is a noteworthy signal. Even more interesting is that future transaction fees will continue to be used for token burns—this recurring recycling mechanism finally gives UNI some practical utility, changing the long-standing awkward situation of tokens lacking empowerment. From a long-term perspective, continuous burning could indeed produce an inflation hedge effect. However, the current question is not whether the timing is right now and then, but how you view the sustainability of this burning mechanism. Can the scale of destruction keep up with new supply? Is the fee pool deep enough? These details are truly worth deep consideration.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhilosopher
· 7h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but can the fee pool really last that long?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyLemur
· 7h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but can it really hold up? Will the fee pool run out?
View OriginalReply0
StablecoinSkeptic
· 7h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but are the fees really enough?
View OriginalReply0
GhostAddressHunter
· 8h ago
The destruction mechanism sounds good, but the key is whether the fee pool is sufficient...
View OriginalReply0
TradingNightmare
· 8h ago
100 million tokens burned is indeed interesting, but it's like patching a leaking bucket. The key is whether the transaction fees can truly plug that hole.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterWang
· 8h ago
Burning 100 million tokens sounds impressive, but is the pool really enough? I'm a bit worried.
The Treasury has completed the destruction of 100 million UNI tokens, which is a noteworthy signal. Even more interesting is that future transaction fees will continue to be used for token burns—this recurring recycling mechanism finally gives UNI some practical utility, changing the long-standing awkward situation of tokens lacking empowerment. From a long-term perspective, continuous burning could indeed produce an inflation hedge effect. However, the current question is not whether the timing is right now and then, but how you view the sustainability of this burning mechanism. Can the scale of destruction keep up with new supply? Is the fee pool deep enough? These details are truly worth deep consideration.