After the December FOMC meeting, the Federal Reserve officially ended QT (quantitative tightening) and shifted to launching the Reserve Management Purchase Plan (RMP). The initial monthly scale is about $40 billion, mainly directed toward short-term Treasury bills (T-bills), with the possibility of extending to maturities of up to 3 years if necessary.



Does this sound like QE? The market indeed calls it that. But the Fed’s own statement is that this is purely a technical operation aimed at maintaining sufficient reserve levels to cope with liquidity fluctuations during the annual economic growth cycle and the April tax season. It is not a policy shift, much less a traditional easing.

The key difference lies here—

While RMP and QE both appear to involve balance sheet expansion and bond purchases, their core mechanisms are entirely different. RMP buys short-term Treasuries, starting at only $40 billion and likely to decrease significantly after a few months; QE, on the other hand, typically targets medium- to long-term Treasuries and MBS, with monthly injections often reaching hundreds of billions. RMP deliberately maintains a low profile, purely for liquidity maintenance; QE is usually accompanied by strong expectations of easing policies.

Why does the market insist on viewing this as a QE preview? There are several reasons. First, the operational forms are similar, both involve balance sheet expansion and bond purchases; second, there was a "mini-QE" precedent in 2019; third, current liquidity conditions are indeed marginally easing, compounded by expectations of Trump-era policies, making it easy to interpret as a prelude to large-scale liquidity injection.

But rationally speaking (based on information up to December 28), RMP is essentially routine maintenance after QT exit. Its scale is limited, and its sustainability is constrained, likely to slow down rapidly after the April 2026 tax season. Unless there are obvious problems in the economy or markets—such as inflation spiraling out of control again or turmoil in the money markets—RMP is unlikely to evolve into genuine QE.

So the key point to watch is this: the actual implementation strength in the first half of 2026. Only then can we truly determine whether this is just routine maintenance or the beginning of easing policies.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ZKProofstervip
· 7h ago
ngl the fed's "technically it's not qe" is giving same energy as "it's not a backdoor, it's just a maintenance port" — sure jan, let's check back in april and see what the actual implementation looks like
Reply0
LayerZeroJunkievip
· 8h ago
Basically, it still depends on how the operations are handled in the first half of 2026. Right now, it's all talk and no action. --- 400 billion dollars is really a stretch; how could this scale be the prelude to QE... --- It feels like the market is collectively daydreaming again, insisting on labeling RMP as QE. --- Stop it, this is just patching things up, not as exciting as everyone imagines. --- I remember the mini wave in 2019, but this time it probably won't be the same. --- Liquidity easing + Trump expectations... it's easy to get the wrong idea. --- Let's wait until 2026 to see the real outcome; anything said now is just talk. --- Short-term government bonds and MBS are not the same at all; the market really misunderstood.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflowervip
· 8h ago
40 billion is really too small, it's simply not enough to watch --- Here we go again, the Federal Reserve says "pure technical operation," and the market interprets it as "liquidity injection announcement," this play is too familiar --- Just wait and see how they implement it in 2026 to know whether it's truly easing or just a show --- What was the result of the mini-QE? Feels like the market always overestimates --- Short-term government bonds? Wait, isn't this just stacking liquidity? No matter how nicely you put it, it doesn't change --- Feels like the Federal Reserve is playing word games, changing definitions so it's no longer QE, right haha --- The key is how Trump’s side will mess around; 40 billion might just be the appetizer --- In my opinion, the limited scale is just for now; there's a high chance they'll increase it later --- Anyway, I’ll just watch how the April tax season performs to judge what this is really about --- Talking so much, it's just fear of market panic, trying a "gentle version of QE" to test the waters
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviservip
· 8h ago
Wait, is 40 billion really just a small fix? Feels like the market's intuition isn't wrong. RMP says it's technical operations, but then they expand the balance sheet and buy bonds... I've heard this rhetoric too many times. Let's see again in mid-2026? By then, we'll probably be trapped already, brother. The Federal Reserve is indeed pretending to be calm this time; anyone who believes that is naive. Trump's expectations of easing combined with this, it's definitely a prelude to a big liquidity injection. 40 billion is just the appetizer; the rest will come slowly. Basically, it's QE with a different name; don't be fooled by the rhetoric. The confirmation of marginal liquidity easing makes the bullish logic more and more solid. This time, it really depends on whether the execution details in the first half of 2026 can be confirmed.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)