Last night's announcement of destroying 100 million UNI indeed caused a stir in the community, but the answer given by the market this morning was quite embarrassing—prices are still bouncing around near 5.8U.



"Deflation shock"? Not seen.

On-chain data shows: the amount destroyed is indeed large, but the net liquidity hardly moved. What does this phenomenon indicate? The market has already digested this positive news. Expectations were already priced in before the announcement was made.

From a technical perspective, UNI is still struggling within the 5.6-6.5 range, and it’s not breaking out anytime soon. The project team’s plan sounds perfect—5-10% deflation annually, which seems like a long-term value release. But in reality? Without new buying interest, destruction is essentially just a game of accounting numbers.

The most heartbreaking scene is unfolding: good news turns into bad news, as the project burns tokens and retail investors lose confidence. Now, the market is watching the 28th timelock unlock closely, but by then, how much capital will still be willing to buy in?

In the short term, it’s hard to see a major breakthrough. If you really want to break through 7U, relying on destruction announcements alone won’t work; you need to see real buying interest return. Until liquidity noticeably improves, volatility will remain the main theme at this level.
UNI6,66%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BlockImpostervip
· 7h ago
Positive news turning into negative, this move is truly exceptional. Retail investors' confidence in avoiding heavy losses is just gone.
View OriginalReply0
DaoResearchervip
· 7h ago
According to on-chain data, this wave of destruction is essentially a typical case of incentive misalignment. Good news: dumping the market, retail investors cutting losses, project teams cashing out—proof of flaws in economic model design. Liquidity has not improved; no matter how many deflation proposals are made, it's all in vain. As the saying goes: destruction without buying support is self-PUA. The real test is the timelock unlock on the 28th. Currently, those optimistic are betting on subsequent funding to take over, but based on past cases of DAO governance failures, this probability does not exceed 30%. Volatility is the way to go.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHuntervip
· 8h ago
Another classic "good news turns into bad news" scenario. On-chain data has already shown everything — net liquidity remains unchanged, which essentially means institutions have already exited.
View OriginalReply0
DecentralizedEldervip
· 8h ago
What’s the point of burning? The market isn't moving at all, and you're still talking about deflation. It's really ironic.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt