Recent discussions about whether XRP can create trillionaire fortunes remain heated, but such focus actually diverges from the core issue. From the perspective of market deep logic, what truly deserves attention is the underlying signal of "U.S. strategic crypto reserves" and the global reshaping of the crypto market it implies.

Why does Joshua suggest that XRP is more suitable than BTC to serve as a strategic reserve? The key lies in the "connection with U.S. financial institutions" and the compliance imagination space it brings. Although BTC has the advantage of high decentralization, this characteristic also makes it difficult for a single country to effectively control. In contrast, Ripple Labs behind XRP maintains long-term cooperation with U.S. financial institutions and has concrete application cases in cross-border payments, giving it a stronger competitive edge in the "controllability" dimension.

However, it must be honest that the current U.S. crypto asset regulatory system is not yet fully mature, and discussing "strategic reserves" at this stage may still be premature. But from another perspective, traditional finance and regulatory agencies have already begun to recognize the strategic value of crypto assets, which is an important signal in itself.

In the future, crypto assets that have the opportunity to enter the "reserve-grade" sequence should meet three basic conditions: strong compliance, clear application scenarios, and controllable market value fluctuations. Besides XRP, mainstream assets like ETH and USDT are also competing for this position. This is the core that market participants should focus on tracking.

From a cyclical perspective, the short-term feasibility of XRP entering U.S. strategic reserves is very low, and the so-called trillionaire is still a distant concept. But from a long-term view, it is highly probable that countries worldwide will incorporate crypto assets into their strategic reserves, which will mark the industry’s move toward maturity.