The $ORDER upgrade of Orderly Network reflects not only a narrative update but also a fundamental shift in the project's value orientation.
What truly moves people? It shifts the focus from "how to design incentive mechanisms" to the fundamental question of "whether users are really using it." This difference in thinking may seem subtle, but it determines the project's long-term vitality.
Specifically, this is reflected in the technical architecture: shared order books, full-chain liquidity aggregation, and the complete implementation of CLOB (Central Limit Order Book)—this combination addresses actual trading efficiency issues rather than hollow economic assumptions. Users stay because of genuine trading experience and depth, not because they are bombarded with incentives and leave quickly.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CountdownToBroke
· 6h ago
Finally, a project that makes sense—it's not just about stacking incentives.
People really using it is the key, and this ORDER move is quite impressive.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyOnMainnet
· 6h ago
To be honest, from the perspective of shifting from incentive stacking to actual usage, this round of ORDER has finally understood it.
However, the CLOB approach really depends on subsequent execution; having just the architecture design is not enough.
View OriginalReply0
¯\_(ツ)_/¯
· 6h ago
That's more like it. Finally, a project has a clear plan.
But can ORDER really stick with this wave? It still depends on whether the trading depth can keep up.
The part about incentive bombing was spot on; many projects have died this way before.
Basically, it all comes down to real users actually using it. Otherwise, no matter how good the architecture looks, it's just a display.
View OriginalReply0
MeaninglessGwei
· 6h ago
Finally, a project has shifted from "how to fool people" to "how to truly get people to use it." Taking the step of ORDER is considered the right move.
I'm already tired of the same old incentive mechanisms; projects that throw money at everything tend to die the fastest.
The combination of shared order books + CLOB indeed addresses the pain points, and with sufficient depth, users won't run away.
But it still depends on real data; I've heard too many verbal promises.
If this time ORDER can improve the trading experience, it might be worth paying attention to.
View OriginalReply0
MaticHoleFiller
· 6h ago
Honestly, shifting from incentive mechanisms to actual usage—ORDER's move here is quite interesting.
CLOB + liquidity aggregation, finally someone willing to do some real work, rather than another round of empty hype.
The $ORDER upgrade of Orderly Network reflects not only a narrative update but also a fundamental shift in the project's value orientation.
What truly moves people? It shifts the focus from "how to design incentive mechanisms" to the fundamental question of "whether users are really using it." This difference in thinking may seem subtle, but it determines the project's long-term vitality.
Specifically, this is reflected in the technical architecture: shared order books, full-chain liquidity aggregation, and the complete implementation of CLOB (Central Limit Order Book)—this combination addresses actual trading efficiency issues rather than hollow economic assumptions. Users stay because of genuine trading experience and depth, not because they are bombarded with incentives and leave quickly.