2025-12-28 04:23:35

Interesting phenomenon: the project's witch addresses are continuously selling, repeating operations every second. If this continues, will the final token distribution gradually return to the project team? It's indeed a bit puzzling—using only 100M in funding, how can they control an airdrop of 1.5B level? The numbers don't seem right. The logical chain behind this really needs to be carefully analyzed.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidityWitch

· 8h ago

Oh man, there's definitely something wrong with these numbers. 100M to leverage 1.5B? The play is so obvious, yet people are still buying in?

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeCrybaby

· 8h ago

The numbers are indeed outrageous. Controlling a 1.5B market with just 100M—no matter how I try to wrap my head around this logic, I just can't understand it.

View OriginalReply0

BrokenYield

· 8h ago

nah this math ain't checking out... 100M moving 1.5B? that's some serious leverage play or straight up sybil attack on steroids. seen this pattern before in 2017, always ends ugly when the correlation matrix breaks down

Reply0

ShibaMillionairen't

· 8h ago

These numbers just don't add up. How can 100M control 1.5B? Isn't that just magic?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterWang