Are you still holding those oracle tokens that only transmit prices? They might be a bit outdated now.



Imagine the era from feature phones to smartphones. The sturdy, durable feature phones that could even crack walnuts were eventually phased out. Not because they broke, but because the times demanded more.

The on-chain world today is similar. The RWA market needs to interpret PDF documents, AI applications require running model computations, and GameFi needs to verify random numbers. These complex tasks cannot be solved by simple price transmission.

Oracles are undergoing a generational leap. From Oracle 1.0's price feeding era to the current Oracle 3.0—truly off-chain computing platforms.

This upgrade is reflected in three dimensions:

**First, it can "see".** Upload an invoice image, and the system can accurately recognize whether the amount is correct. This is OCR capability.

**Second, it can "calculate".** Input risk control models, and the system can determine whether a loan should be issued. This is where privacy-preserving computation plays a role.

**Third, it can "think".** Two AI models compete, and the system acts as a judge to decide the winner. This requires ZK verification support.

While the market is still competing over who can transmit prices faster, the new generation of oracles is already building true off-chain computing platforms.

Capital markets are always chasing new narratives. The story of Oracle 1.0 has been told for four years. Now, it's time for Oracle 3.0 to take the stage.

Have you updated your holdings to keep pace with this version upgrade?
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
UncommonNPCvip
· 18h ago
The part about the feature phone smashing walnuts was quite a stunt, but honestly, will this cycle of replacement just be another hype-driven show?
View OriginalReply0
APY_Chaservip
· 18h ago
It sounds flashy, but the real question is whether any projects can actually implement these concepts. Don't just tell stories.
View OriginalReply0
All-InQueenvip
· 18h ago
Another new narrative about cutting leeks again. I heard the analogy of feature phones evolving into smartphones last year.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCriervip
· 18h ago
You're trying to persuade us to change positions again. We've heard this spiel three times already.
View OriginalReply0
PoolJumpervip
· 18h ago
It's been so long, and I still haven't seen the true form of 3.0. Is it all just hype and conceptual speculation?
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 18h ago
From a technical architecture perspective, the claim that Oracle 1.0 to 3.0 represents a leap is somewhat oversimplified. It is worth noting that the number of off-chain computation solutions currently capable of stable on-chain operation is very limited.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainDetectivevip
· 19h ago
This explanation sounds nice, but are there really projects that can handle "seeing," "calculating," and "thinking" all at once? It seems like there are more people just bragging.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)