In the early days of digital payments, there was a critical lesson about fraud prevention: the moment you implement real safeguards against scams and illicit activity, the loudest objections come from those operating outside the rules. This principle holds true across fintech platforms and blockchain systems today—stricter security measures inevitably trigger resistance from bad actors who benefited from loose controls. It's a tradeoff worth making: protecting legitimate users and capital flow matters far more than appeasing those exploiting system vulnerabilities.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 8
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
FancyResearchLabvip
· 2h ago
Here we go again with this set. The real opposition never comes from bad actors, but from those law-abiding users caught in the middle. Lu Ban No. 7 is working again. Theoretically, it should be feasible, but in practice, every time protective measures are added, it's like shackling ourselves. This contract is a bit interesting, just a little too "secure." Are you saying the opposite? Users who survive with loose controls are the true warriors. When strict measures are implemented, the first to cry foul might not necessarily be bad actors. It's just another useless innovation, giving more reasons for authority. I'll try this smart trap first and see if it gets frozen. When it comes to anti-fraud, the most dangerous time is when it's done under the banner of protection. Now that it's mastered, it's been KYC'ed.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 14h ago
You're a tough person. The stricter you are, the louder the scammers shout. This logic makes perfect sense.
View OriginalReply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 14h ago
Yes, that's correct. Strict regulation indeed causes those involved in gray-area businesses to complain the loudest, which really highlights the issue.
View OriginalReply0
CountdownToBrokevip
· 15h ago
Haha, that's why those involved in shady activities always curse KYC. They deserve it.
View OriginalReply0
StakeOrRegretvip
· 15h ago
The louder the opposition, the more it indicates that the measures hit the sore spot—that's right.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainTherapistvip
· 15h ago
Once strict risk control measures are implemented, you'll immediately know who is operating in the gray areas.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 15h ago
This is the reality. The louder the opposition to regulation, the more it shows that the rules are really hitting the core issues.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerMinervip
· 15h ago
To be honest, strict regulation is actually a filtering process. Isn't it true that the bad actors are the loudest?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)