ZEC broke through the neckline with high volume yesterday. To be honest, this exceeded my previous expectations, and my judgment of the rebound height was also off. However, from the weekly chart perspective, I still maintain the original view—this is just a B-wave rebound (confirmed by three consecutive weeks of decreasing volume), and there is a high probability that a C-wave decline will follow. The breakout indeed adds more uncertainty. If you want to short, it's best to set the liquidation price above 800, and moving it to $1000 would be the safest.



To focus efforts on ZEC's market, I closed my position yesterday when XMR approached the breakeven point. This rebound started from a low of $300, reaching a high of $527, with a gain of 75%. But my three holdings combined have given back $60,000 in profit, experiencing another rollercoaster. Coupled with the three fluctuations during the previous top-building phase, the weekly chart now shows the fourth rollercoaster. Long-term holding is like this; the core is being tested repeatedly by volatility. As long as the overall direction isn't too far off, there's no need to overthink the intermediate fluctuations.

I placed an order in the $480-$520 range for 12,000U. Currently, my main position still has over 10,000U in unrealized profit, another position has shrunk to over 4,000U, and all USDC unrealized gains have been wiped out. During this rally, I added several tens of thousands of U in short positions, with a total position size around $250,000. Yesterday, I also added margin to control risk, setting the liquidation price around 800.

Market data shows that this rally has liquidated a large number of high-leverage shorts. According to smart money holdings, 85% of shorts are in loss. Only a few long-term shorts are still profitable. Funding rates have stabilized, indicating limited willingness for new shorts to enter after the breakout—either they were forcibly liquidated or they no longer dare to add positions. The next focus is whether ZEC can hold steady at the $500 level. There are still a lot of trapped orders above; if it cannot break $500 within the next three trading days and turns around, yesterday’s breakout was likely a false breakout. Operationally, I recommend being conservative: prioritize adding margin, be cautious when increasing positions, and closely watch whether the $500 support holds.
ZEC2,04%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MevWhisperervip
· 10h ago
Oh wow, this ZEC move really caught me off guard. I didn't expect it to be this aggressive.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiHeirvip
· 10h ago
It should be pointed out that your current operation logic itself has logical flaws. B-wave rebound can break through the neckline? This directly contradicts the basic axioms of wave theory. Wait, let's look back at the on-chain data—85% of short positions are at a loss. This argument is actually quite interesting; from a certain perspective, it instead proves that market consensus is being reshaped. Is the false breakout hypothesis you mentioned valid?
View OriginalReply0
DaoDevelopervip
· 10h ago
yo this elliott wave breakdown is honestly pretty sharp—the b-wave thesis with three weeks of declining volume does hit different. but ngl, 25k usd at risk with liquidation around 800 sounds like youre basically gambling on whether 500 holds or not lmaooo
Reply0
AltcoinHuntervip
· 10h ago
Speaking of which, this wave of ZEC's movement is indeed a bit strange, it feels like everyone has been played by it. From 300 to 527, a 75% increase looks exciting, but losing 60,000 U in profit is outrageous, and that's the part I dislike about the crypto world. I believe in the logic of B-wave rebound + C-wave decline, but currently, the short positions are at 85% loss, which is a bit frightening. It indicates that when a break occurs, you really need to be cautious. The 500 level is indeed critical. If it can't hold, a breakout would truly be a false breakout, and then it would be another feast for the chives. But speaking of which, risking 250,000 U in scale like this, I really admire your mindset... or maybe I feel a bit sorry for your wallet.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdropvip
· 10h ago
Losing 60,000 U in a retracement is really outrageous. This roller coaster ride is truly incredible. The long-term holding mindset is really solid.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)