#数字资产市场动态 Deflation has become a new trend in the crypto world, but the two leading projects have vastly different approaches. Let's see whose strategy is more aggressive.

AST has a somewhat different approach—simply put, it's a "dual-wheel drive." One side uses real cash income to directly buy back and burn tokens (Burndrop plan), while the other collaborates with Japanese financial giant SBI to promote compliant stablecoins. The logic behind this strategy is clear: the more the ecosystem is used, the scarcer the tokens become, and ultimately, the value depends on whether the entire ecosystem can expand into a closed loop.

Uniswap's approach is completely opposite—it follows the idea of "building a foundation first, then sharing the benefits." As the world's largest DEX, it already generates continuous protocol revenue. Now, by activating the fee switch, it directly uses these earnings to burn UNI. It's straightforward: taking the visible, existing protocol value and pouring it into governance tokens. From a governance tool, it transforms into a true value asset in one step.

One project is about building a deflationary economy from zero to one, while the other is about the ultimate recovery of already established protocol value. $UNI $ASTER $ZEC projects truly demonstrate two completely different value imagination paths in the crypto market.

Which team do you support? Honestly, both approaches have their own strengths and impact.