People who focus solely on incremental gains often overlook a bigger issue—when the principal starts to wobble, returns become fleeting clouds.
What happens if a stablecoin loses its peg? Many people's first reaction is trading, but in reality, the first reaction should be "escape." History has already given us answers through several classic events.
Let's start with the story of UST. Initially, it was just a slight de-pegging, and everyone said it would return to $1 soon. Later, it was realized that $1 was just an ideal, and eventually, it completely collapsed. Looking at USDC during the bank turmoil— the problem wasn't with the model design but with issues on the real-world side. At that time, the market truly realized a problem: the security of stablecoins also depends on the face of traditional financial institutions. The logic behind FTX and FTT is similar; although not stablecoins, they are also credit assets. Once credit is questioned, price movements won't give you any time to react or explanations.
These events share a common point worth deep reflection: the real trigger for a crash is never the moment of de-pegging itself but the chain reaction that follows. Why do crashes happen? Ultimately, it's due to these factors—insufficient asset reserves, sudden liquidity crunch, and market confidence collapsing first. What's the most critical? Everyone loses faith simultaneously.
So, what is most closely related to a crash? Not the yield rate, but three things going wrong: trust, liquidity, and time. As long as these three elements simultaneously encounter problems, whether it's called a stablecoin, platform token, or some new variation, the final outcome is largely the same.
Conversely, the risk tolerance of exchanges becomes especially crucial. Here, we're not talking about market propaganda or reputation but three core strengths: whether they truly have asset reserves, whether they can withstand large-scale withdrawal pressures, and whether they are willing to cover losses with their own funds at critical moments.
Therefore, the core issue is never whether a particular stablecoin will de-peg but whether, if it really happens, your current position is on the side of "being caught off guard." Remember this, because history's favorite trick is to rebrand and replay the same story.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
5 Likes
Reward
5
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DefiVeteran
· 9h ago
It's the same old story, the real problem is that it's slow and dies quickly.
I just laughed at the UST wave, still at 1 dollar, just a dream.
The key is whether the exchange has real backing, not just talk.
Historical cycles, rebranding and reenacting, always the same routine.
I just think, what if one day something really happens, I need to react immediately and not get caught.
Stablecoins are full of crap, it all depends on people's confidence and liquidity.
No matter how high the yield is, it's useless; losing the principal is the real game-changer.
View OriginalReply0
IfIWereOnChain
· 9h ago
At the end of the day, trust is the most fragile thing; it can collapse in a second.
I've seen too many people jump into the UST pit; I really should have run at that moment.
When liquidity gets stuck, no one can save you—that's the real killer.
How many exchanges dare to cover losses out of their own pockets? Just thinking about it is frightening.
History really likes to repeat itself, just with a different coin name.
View OriginalReply0
GweiObserver
· 9h ago
Really, that wave of UST was a textbook example of a cautionary tale. Those still waiting to get back to 1 dollar have been trapped and wiped out.
The moment liquidity freezes, you should run. Don't think about trying to buy the dip against the trend.
History loves to repeat itself, just with different names. Harsh.
The key is whether the exchange has real funds; reputation alone is虚假的.
Major collapses never happen overnight; they are chain reactions. If the reaction is slow, it's game over.
The higher the yield, the more cautious you should be. If the principal is gone, what’s the point of the returns?
People who focus solely on incremental gains often overlook a bigger issue—when the principal starts to wobble, returns become fleeting clouds.
What happens if a stablecoin loses its peg? Many people's first reaction is trading, but in reality, the first reaction should be "escape." History has already given us answers through several classic events.
Let's start with the story of UST. Initially, it was just a slight de-pegging, and everyone said it would return to $1 soon. Later, it was realized that $1 was just an ideal, and eventually, it completely collapsed. Looking at USDC during the bank turmoil— the problem wasn't with the model design but with issues on the real-world side. At that time, the market truly realized a problem: the security of stablecoins also depends on the face of traditional financial institutions. The logic behind FTX and FTT is similar; although not stablecoins, they are also credit assets. Once credit is questioned, price movements won't give you any time to react or explanations.
These events share a common point worth deep reflection: the real trigger for a crash is never the moment of de-pegging itself but the chain reaction that follows. Why do crashes happen? Ultimately, it's due to these factors—insufficient asset reserves, sudden liquidity crunch, and market confidence collapsing first. What's the most critical? Everyone loses faith simultaneously.
So, what is most closely related to a crash? Not the yield rate, but three things going wrong: trust, liquidity, and time. As long as these three elements simultaneously encounter problems, whether it's called a stablecoin, platform token, or some new variation, the final outcome is largely the same.
Conversely, the risk tolerance of exchanges becomes especially crucial. Here, we're not talking about market propaganda or reputation but three core strengths: whether they truly have asset reserves, whether they can withstand large-scale withdrawal pressures, and whether they are willing to cover losses with their own funds at critical moments.
Therefore, the core issue is never whether a particular stablecoin will de-peg but whether, if it really happens, your current position is on the side of "being caught off guard." Remember this, because history's favorite trick is to rebrand and replay the same story.