Observing several Korean-based crypto projects in 2025, some trends are worth warning about. Do you remember the Uxlink incident? Originally capped at 1 billion tokens, suddenly 100 trillion tokens were minted, with various reasons given. Similar scenarios are also happening with FLOW—abnormal data, contract issues, technical vulnerabilities... each time with an official explanation. The underlying logic is clear: project issues → blame hackers or technical failures → retail investors and token holders end up paying the price. This pattern is common in the market, and Korean project teams especially love this approach. The key is that most people still don’t understand what actually happened afterward. Investors need to stay alert; the risk patterns of these projects are actually quite predictable.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
StableBoi
· 9h ago
Korean projects, this routine is really getting old. I still remember the 10 trillion tokens from Uxlink, it's hilarious. No matter how nicely you put it, it can't hide the essence of cutting leeks.
View OriginalReply0
Token_Sherpa
· 9h ago
ngl the supply elasticity playbook is getting lazy at this point... uxlink to flow? same energy, different timestamp. devs really said "let's just mint our way out of this" lmao
Reply0
NftRegretMachine
· 9h ago
Another one? I saw through Uxlink's move, and now FLOW is doing the same. Korean projects are really impressive.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoPunster
· 9h ago
Laughing as I lose this one, I've memorized all the tricks of the Korean project. Turning 1 billion into 10 trillion, this math problem is truly brilliant.
View OriginalReply0
LonelyAnchorman
· 9h ago
It's the same old trick from Korean projects, always coming up with new variations every time.
Observing several Korean-based crypto projects in 2025, some trends are worth warning about. Do you remember the Uxlink incident? Originally capped at 1 billion tokens, suddenly 100 trillion tokens were minted, with various reasons given. Similar scenarios are also happening with FLOW—abnormal data, contract issues, technical vulnerabilities... each time with an official explanation. The underlying logic is clear: project issues → blame hackers or technical failures → retail investors and token holders end up paying the price. This pattern is common in the market, and Korean project teams especially love this approach. The key is that most people still don’t understand what actually happened afterward. Investors need to stay alert; the risk patterns of these projects are actually quite predictable.