GHO's annual revenue stream—hovering between $10-15 million—has become the flashpoint in an internal power struggle. AAVE DAO and AAVE Labs are locked in a tug-of-war over who controls this income source. The market has largely dismissed it as organizational dysfunction, but here's the real story: they're fighting over a slice of $150 million in annual protocol revenue. That's not noise—that's structural wealth. BlackRock's hesitation to deploy north of $500 million into the ecosystem hinges on one critical factor: legal clarity around governance and revenue rights. Institutional capital doesn't move without institutional certainty. The resolution? Both sides are signaling toward a compromise framework scheduled for Q2 2025. The emerging structure aims to distribute control in a way that satisfies regulatory scrutiny while preserving the DAO's decision-making authority. When you strip away the governance drama, what you're seeing is how mature DeFi protocols solve the age-old question: who owns the cash flow, and under what terms can trillion-dollar institutions feel comfortable participating?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretful
· 11h ago
To be honest, this internal conflict over GHO looks a bit funny... but upon closer reflection, it's indeed a big deal. A 1.5 billion market competing for just over 10 million—that's the real key. Blackstone is actually just waiting for peace of mind; only with a legal framework will they dare to put real money in. It's already good if there's a result in Q2.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecorder
· 11h ago
BlackRock is really waiting for legal clarity. With 500 million USD just hanging there, honestly, it's a power struggle. Until they sort out who the hell is the boss, nothing will be settled.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 11h ago
Haha, it's another internal governance struggle. This is the real battle of interests... What is BlackRock waiting for? They will only be willing to invest once the compliance standards are set.
View OriginalReply0
SlowLearnerWang
· 11h ago
Here we go again, another classic power struggle... It was obvious that there was some shady activity within AAVE long ago, and now you're only uncovering the 1.5 billion cake battle? That's a bit late, everyone. BlackRock is still watching the show, waiting for them to clarify the legal framework before taking action. Isn't this the approach of a mature institution... I mean, if they can't resolve it by Q2, this matter could be dragged out until mid-next year.
View OriginalReply0
token_therapist
· 11h ago
To be honest, this wave of power struggles looks pretty boring, but behind it is a $150 million pie... Blackstone's over 5 million dollars not coming in is a signal, legal clarity is the real threshold for institutions.
View OriginalReply0
DefiEngineerJack
· 12h ago
ngl the real alpha here is watching institutions figure out *how* to not break their compliance department. blackrock doesn't care about governance theater—they care about revenue certainty. if aave can't answer "whose money is this?" in plain legal english, $500m stays on the sidelines. that's the actual bottleneck
GHO's annual revenue stream—hovering between $10-15 million—has become the flashpoint in an internal power struggle. AAVE DAO and AAVE Labs are locked in a tug-of-war over who controls this income source. The market has largely dismissed it as organizational dysfunction, but here's the real story: they're fighting over a slice of $150 million in annual protocol revenue. That's not noise—that's structural wealth. BlackRock's hesitation to deploy north of $500 million into the ecosystem hinges on one critical factor: legal clarity around governance and revenue rights. Institutional capital doesn't move without institutional certainty. The resolution? Both sides are signaling toward a compromise framework scheduled for Q2 2025. The emerging structure aims to distribute control in a way that satisfies regulatory scrutiny while preserving the DAO's decision-making authority. When you strip away the governance drama, what you're seeing is how mature DeFi protocols solve the age-old question: who owns the cash flow, and under what terms can trillion-dollar institutions feel comfortable participating?