Recently, while examining various DeFi protocols, I noticed an interesting phenomenon.



In simple terms, most DeFi projects nowadays are essentially "gambling"—betting on price trends, liquidity levels, user retention, TVL sustainability, and cycle continuation. If they guess right, they are praised as "disruptive innovation"; if they guess wrong, they face "panic liquidations" or "mechanism vulnerabilities," always sounding the same.

However, projects like Falcon Finance have a completely different approach. Their core is not about betting on the market but about transforming收益 from a "probabilistic event" into a "reproducible event" through system design. Simply put: making money not through emotional volatility but through the inherent cash flow generated by the structure itself. It doesn't require continuous market feeding; the system can generate its own blood.

This is the kind of project that can truly cross cycles—not chasing fads quickly, but building a solid foundation.

**One key point I want to emphasize is:**

Falcon's purpose is not to make DeFi more exciting, higher-yielding, or to create short-term爆点, but rather—to make the entire ecosystem more trustworthy, yields more controllable, and to establish a genuine long-term mechanism.

**First point: Turning "收益" from a random variable into a deterministic variable**

The sources of收益 in traditional DeFi projects are nothing more than:

• Relying on market fluctuations
• Relying on trading volatility
• Relying on platform subsidies
• Relying on TVL scale
• Relying on user interaction behavior

All of these are random variables. Any looseness in one link can cause the entire收益 system to collapse.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 5h ago
Sounds like you're selling a story. Can Falcon really generate its own revenue? I don't believe you.
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabondvip
· 10h ago
It's the same old Falcon rhetoric, just listen and don't take it seriously.
View OriginalReply0
OnchainSnipervip
· 10h ago
Sounds like another self-indulgent article about a rescue project Honestly, I've heard this kind of "system self-sustaining" rhetoric too many times I just want to see the data, show it to me
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamervip
· 10h ago
To be honest, DeFi is now just a gambling arena. Win the bet and you're a genius; lose the bet and you're a fool. Speaking of Falcon, this idea is indeed fresh, but can it really "self-sustain"? I still need to see the data before I believe it. The biggest problem with this kind of thing is that it sounds good, but after two weeks of actual operation, problems will arise.
View OriginalReply0
Layer2Observervip
· 10h ago
Hmm... That's an interesting point, but I need to look at the source code to see how the "self-sustaining" logic is implemented. Talking about structural stability is easy; data proof is what really counts.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)