Recently, the crypto world has been flooded with news about regulations—Japan’s financial regulators have upgraded the management level of crypto assets, and the US Congress has passed the CLARITY Act. For a time, many people started to worry: "Once regulated, there’s no more freedom," leading to panic selling.
But I’ve been in this industry for eight years and want to tell everyone a fact: don’t rush to be pessimistic. What seems like strict compliance is actually building a "moat" around mainstream coins like BTC and ETH. It can weed out truly junk projects, helping the entire industry stand firmer and go further.
Why do I say this? Let’s look at three core changes in global regulation.
**First is clearer positioning.** Previously, crypto assets were like unclaimed "black households"—neither traditional currency nor under securities law. Now, it’s different. Japan officially classifies crypto assets as "financial products," and the US explicitly categorizes BTC and ETH as "digital commodities." This may seem simple, but in fact, it provides a legal basis for investor protection. When something goes wrong, investors now know who to turn to for rights protection. Only then can mainstream capital truly be attracted.
**Second is clearer division of responsibilities.** In the US, the SEC and CFTC used to often hinder each other, forcing project teams to deal with both, risking being caught in the middle. Japan has also established a new independent department to handle this. Now, the boundaries of regulation are clear, project teams know what rules to follow and whom to report to, which actually reduces compliance costs. This is a real benefit for the industry’s long-term development.
**Third is clear standards.** From exchange risk control requirements to asset security standards, although details vary across countries, the overall direction is consistent. What does this standardization mean? It means that truly capable platforms and projects will survive, while those pretending to be something they’re not will eventually be eliminated.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
6 Likes
Reward
6
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
OptionWhisperer
· 9h ago
Damn, an old player of eight years is right—regulation is actually creating a moat for major cryptocurrencies. Trash projects should be cleaned up.
View OriginalReply0
MetaEggplant
· 9h ago
Eight years of experience means something, but I guess retail investors who are selling off this wave just won't listen haha
---
The analogy of a compliance moat isn't bad; trash projects really should be kicked out
---
Wait, shouldn't those exchanges that ran away have been eliminated by standards long ago?
---
With regulation coming, old projects are surviving more steadily. What about new tokens? It seems even harder to launch them?
---
It's easy to say, but in the end, everyone still has to pay money to various departments haha
---
The moment BTC and ETH were defined as digital commodities, it truly felt different
---
Really, when the SEC and CFTC were bickering before, I almost threw up. Now, at least someone is regulating
---
The phrase "moat" is true; those air coins really need to settle down
---
Mainstream funds want to enter the market? I think we need to wait a bit longer; regulation is just getting started
---
Standardization means no more easy gains, right? It's a bit uncomfortable
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMiner
· 9h ago
Hmm... Eight-year veteran makes a good point, but I'm still scared. This wave of selling is really frightening.
Wait, the metaphor of a moat is pretty good; mainstream coins do have advantages.
Speaking of which, what about those small coins? Getting out is truly a painful lesson.
Recently, the crypto world has been flooded with news about regulations—Japan’s financial regulators have upgraded the management level of crypto assets, and the US Congress has passed the CLARITY Act. For a time, many people started to worry: "Once regulated, there’s no more freedom," leading to panic selling.
But I’ve been in this industry for eight years and want to tell everyone a fact: don’t rush to be pessimistic. What seems like strict compliance is actually building a "moat" around mainstream coins like BTC and ETH. It can weed out truly junk projects, helping the entire industry stand firmer and go further.
Why do I say this? Let’s look at three core changes in global regulation.
**First is clearer positioning.** Previously, crypto assets were like unclaimed "black households"—neither traditional currency nor under securities law. Now, it’s different. Japan officially classifies crypto assets as "financial products," and the US explicitly categorizes BTC and ETH as "digital commodities." This may seem simple, but in fact, it provides a legal basis for investor protection. When something goes wrong, investors now know who to turn to for rights protection. Only then can mainstream capital truly be attracted.
**Second is clearer division of responsibilities.** In the US, the SEC and CFTC used to often hinder each other, forcing project teams to deal with both, risking being caught in the middle. Japan has also established a new independent department to handle this. Now, the boundaries of regulation are clear, project teams know what rules to follow and whom to report to, which actually reduces compliance costs. This is a real benefit for the industry’s long-term development.
**Third is clear standards.** From exchange risk control requirements to asset security standards, although details vary across countries, the overall direction is consistent. What does this standardization mean? It means that truly capable platforms and projects will survive, while those pretending to be something they’re not will eventually be eliminated.