2025-12-27 20:27:31

Does Uniswap V4's fee mechanism really have an arbitrage loophole? Or is this protocol design itself aimed at capturing fee revenue? This is a question worth in-depth discussion—after all, the fee structure of DEXes directly affects liquidity providers' returns.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

11 Likes

Reward
11
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RamenDeFiSurvivor

· 6h ago

Hey, wait a minute. I still can't quite understand the fee logic of V4 after looking at it for a long time.

View OriginalReply0

OneBlockAtATime

· 6h ago

The tricks of the fee mechanism, to put it simply, it still depends on who is smarter.

View OriginalReply0

DefiPlaybook

· 6h ago

Arbitrage loophole? Buddy, this is a feature of V4, not a bug. Uniswap has long figured out how to let market makers skim from fees; the key is whether your APY calculator is accurate enough.

View OriginalReply0

ChainSauceMaster

· 6h ago

Just by looking at this question, you can tell it's another setup to get exploited. The fee structure of V4 is really designed to let big players profit at the expense of small investors.

View OriginalReply0

DataBartender

· 7h ago

The fee mechanism, to put it simply, is the protocol playing psychological warfare with LPs... Design flaw? I think it's intentional.

View OriginalReply0

GasWastingMaximalist

· 7h ago

I think the core of the fee mechanism is about who can run faster. It's not a vulnerability issue but rather a battle of efficiency.

View OriginalReply0