Major Wall Street players are tightening their grip on stablecoin operators. A major banking institution just froze accounts belonging to two stablecoin startups citing sanctions compliance issues—and it signals where traditional finance draws the line.



The move reflects growing tension between the crypto ecosystem and conventional banking infrastructure. Stablecoin projects, already under intense regulatory scrutiny, now face additional friction from correspondent banks implementing stricter KYC protocols and sanctions screening. When institutional payment rails start blocking crypto businesses, it creates real operational bottlenecks.

This isn't the first time we've seen this pattern. Banks increasingly view crypto as a compliance minefield, especially anything touching fiat on-ramps or stablecoin backing reserves. The pressure isn't coming from regulators alone—it's coming from internal risk management teams nervous about exposure to digital asset volatility and reputational damage.

For stablecoin projects, the lesson is uncomfortable but clear: operating at the intersection of traditional banking and crypto requires bulletproof compliance frameworks. Without direct banking relationships, many face an uncertain path forward.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainMemeDealervip
· 6h ago
Banks are causing trouble again; stablecoin projects are really too difficult. Wall Street is trying to kill crypto, directly freezing accounts. That's why we need truly decentralized solutions. What are banks afraid of? Honestly, they're afraid of risk and trouble. Stablecoins are caught in the middle; no one wants to provoke them. Compliance costs are so high that small projects simply can't withstand it. So, it's better to manage your own wallet to feel secure.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatchervip
· 6h ago
This is the traditional finance playing its tricks. It's impossible for stablecoins to navigate smoothly. Banks are truly cowardly; as soon as sanctions are mentioned, accounts are frozen. No matter how much the compliance framework is improved, it's useless. Wait, if this continues, doesn't the meaning of stablecoins become meaningless... Just build a wall directly; anyway, they've wanted to do this for a long time. Wow, two startups being frozen at the same time—are they trying to set an example?
View OriginalReply0
Gm_Gn_Merchantvip
· 7h ago
Banks are starting to tighten restrictions again, is it the stablecoins' turn this time? Should have known it would turn out like this --- Traditional finance is just afraid; everything falls into compliance traps --- No banking relationship = being slowly starved out, the rules of the game are clearly written --- Alright, stablecoins still have to bow and scrape to traditional finance, no way around it --- So, no matter how awesome the crypto world is, it can't escape the banking system, isn't that ironic? --- KYC procedures are getting more and more absurd; even stablecoins can't survive --- Waiting to see which stablecoin will be forced to seek alternative banking solutions --- That's why decentralization will always be a false proposition... Power has never left traditional finance
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)