I'd hold off on MLG positions for now. The core issue here is management stability—until RuneCrypto is no longer a key figure, there's too much uncertainty baked into this one. Projects live or die on leadership execution, and when that's in flux, it's not worth the exposure. Better opportunities exist where the team alignment is clearer.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BuyHighSellLow
· 9h ago
Honestly, I've fallen into the RuneCrypto trap before. When the leader swings, the entire project collapses. Better to wait and see; there's no need to gamble.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxiety
· 9h ago
ngl runecrypto this person is indeed a disaster, the management's one-man rule really can't afford to gamble
View OriginalReply0
AirdropDreamer
· 9h ago
As long as management remains unstable for a day, this project will be a ticking time bomb. Let's wait and see before getting on board.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainFoodie
· 9h ago
nah honestly this gives off the same vibes as a kitchen with a questionable head chef—like, can't trust the recipe if the one cooking it's always threatening to walk out, you know? management drama is literally the spoiled ingredient that ruins the whole dish. better grab something with stable governance structures fr fr
I'd hold off on MLG positions for now. The core issue here is management stability—until RuneCrypto is no longer a key figure, there's too much uncertainty baked into this one. Projects live or die on leadership execution, and when that's in flux, it's not worth the exposure. Better opportunities exist where the team alignment is clearer.