From an investment perspective, the $Max project combines three interesting qualities. First is the传播力 of Meme — this trait inherently carries social genes. Second is the charitable mission behind it, which gives the project a positive social significance. Additionally, it builds a global public welfare ecosystem入口, making these features quite rare.
Choosing $Max is, to some extent, a bet on a "consensus for good." Historically, communities with genuine moral foundations and social value tend to last longer. It's not necessarily that they have the biggest gains, but they possess resilience and durability that other projects find hard to replicate. People in the community are not only for profit but also for a certain belief — this is the key difference.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ProbablyNothing
· 12-27 19:50
To be honest, the combination of meme + charity sounds a bit idealistic, but it does hit something.
The consensus of doing good sounds good, but I don't know how long it can last, after all, the faith in the crypto world can be quite fragile sometimes.
I agree with the argument about community resilience; it's definitely more resilient than those purely speculative projects.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarm
· 12-27 19:50
The combination of charity + meme sounds very appealing, but I'm more concerned about what the data in the contract says. How are those large account addresses distributed now? Has the fund concentration exceeded 20%?
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 12-27 19:49
ngl this narrative of the "Goodness Consensus" can definitely be quite captivating, but for projects that truly stand the test of time... I still want to see actual data before making any judgments.
View OriginalReply0
IronHeadMiner
· 12-27 19:47
Hey, are you really using charity as a gimmick? Let's see how long it can last.
View OriginalReply0
PoetryOnChain
· 12-27 19:44
A consensus to bet on goodness? It sounds quite idealistic, but I'm more concerned about how long this resilience can last... Can faith be turned into money? Haha
View OriginalReply0
SolidityStruggler
· 12-27 19:22
I just think this set of "Goodness Consensus" rhetoric is a bit... "honeyed confidence," right? Will history really treat it this way?
From an investment perspective, the $Max project combines three interesting qualities. First is the传播力 of Meme — this trait inherently carries social genes. Second is the charitable mission behind it, which gives the project a positive social significance. Additionally, it builds a global public welfare ecosystem入口, making these features quite rare.
Choosing $Max is, to some extent, a bet on a "consensus for good." Historically, communities with genuine moral foundations and social value tend to last longer. It's not necessarily that they have the biggest gains, but they possess resilience and durability that other projects find hard to replicate. People in the community are not only for profit but also for a certain belief — this is the key difference.