Most people when mentioning oracles think of the concept of "price feeding," as if it’s just a small supporting role in the DeFi ecosystem. But looking at the 2024-2026 time window, you'll find that oracles are actually being pulled in different directions simultaneously by three forces.
First, the product innovation in prediction markets is accelerating. These projects need to determine the outcomes of real-world events — the problem is that events often have fuzzy boundaries and are not simply black or white. Second, the logic of RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) is shifting from "telling a story" to "providing audit reports, evidence chains, and compliance interfaces." The data forms are expanding from mere price figures to include contracts, bills, registration records, images, logistics tracking, and the entire set. Third, the rise of AI Agents is changing the way on-chain data is consumed — no longer just smart contracts reading a single data point, but agents understanding the world, reasoning, and then feeding conclusions back to contract execution.
Looking deeper, these three directions share a common underlying demand: **explainability**. It’s not just about giving you an answer, but about presenting the complete logic behind why the answer is valid.
From this perspective, APRO, I think, has at least set the right direction. It treats unstructured data as the core battleground, leveraging LLMs’ understanding capabilities within a network architecture that can be repeatedly verified and constrained. An authoritative analysis organization summarized its architectural approach: a three-layer structure — judgment layer, submitter layer, on-chain settlement contract — combining AI analysis capabilities with traditional verification mechanisms, allowing applications to access both structured and unstructured data.
Why is this design important? Because applications like prediction markets and RWA are often not about "lacking a data point," but about "lacking a complete data chain" — the need for full traceability from raw information to final conclusion.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
7 Likes
Reward
7
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CommunitySlacker
· 12h ago
Ha, finally someone has explained the oracle thing clearly. It's not just about feeding a price and calling it a day.
Actually, I’ve looked at APRO’s three-layer architecture for a while, and the core idea is to combine AI with on-chain verification? Sounds good, but I’m just worried that the implementation might be another story.
Unstructured data is indeed a blue ocean, but the problem is who will ensure that the LLM’s reasoning doesn’t go off the rails.
The real test for RWA is compliance. No matter how strong the technology and how complete the data link, a single regulatory statement can still bring everything to a halt.
The fuzzy boundaries of prediction markets are the funniest. When disputes actually arise, can this explainability really be taken seriously?
It feels like in the 2024-2026 wave, oracles will either take off or become antiques—there’s no middle ground.
View OriginalReply0
MEV_Whisperer
· 12h ago
Ha, finally someone has explained this clearly. Previously, everyone thought oracles were too simple.
---
Explainability is indeed a pain point. If the audit reports for RWA can't be traced back to who verified them, how can anyone trust them?
---
APRO's three-layer architecture feels like filling a real existing gap. No one has really done a good job in handling unstructured data before.
---
The hardest part of the gray areas in prediction markets is who makes the judgment? This verification mechanism must be robust enough to hold.
---
The observation about the change in on-chain data consumption methods is good. AI agents reading data and contracts reading prices are fundamentally two different things.
---
But honestly, no matter how good the architecture is, it depends on whether it can be practically implemented. Let's wait and see how it performs in real-world applications.
---
The shift of RWA from storytelling to requiring an evidence chain is indeed a sign of the market becoming more rational.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSurvivor
· 12h ago
Oh, this oracle issue. I've been watching the market for so many years, and honestly, it's just a supply line battle. Whoever can establish a reliable data link wins.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 12h ago
To be honest, I used to treat oracles just as price feed tools. Now looking at this analysis, it's a bit of a face slap... Three-layer tearing apart, I really didn't expect that.
The most important thing is still the explainability. RWA really can't keep playing the "storytelling" game anymore; the market is now demanding a chain of evidence.
The APRO approach is quite interesting. The path of unstructured data is actually filling in the shortcomings of DeFi.
Most people when mentioning oracles think of the concept of "price feeding," as if it’s just a small supporting role in the DeFi ecosystem. But looking at the 2024-2026 time window, you'll find that oracles are actually being pulled in different directions simultaneously by three forces.
First, the product innovation in prediction markets is accelerating. These projects need to determine the outcomes of real-world events — the problem is that events often have fuzzy boundaries and are not simply black or white. Second, the logic of RWA (Real World Asset on-chain) is shifting from "telling a story" to "providing audit reports, evidence chains, and compliance interfaces." The data forms are expanding from mere price figures to include contracts, bills, registration records, images, logistics tracking, and the entire set. Third, the rise of AI Agents is changing the way on-chain data is consumed — no longer just smart contracts reading a single data point, but agents understanding the world, reasoning, and then feeding conclusions back to contract execution.
Looking deeper, these three directions share a common underlying demand: **explainability**. It’s not just about giving you an answer, but about presenting the complete logic behind why the answer is valid.
From this perspective, APRO, I think, has at least set the right direction. It treats unstructured data as the core battleground, leveraging LLMs’ understanding capabilities within a network architecture that can be repeatedly verified and constrained. An authoritative analysis organization summarized its architectural approach: a three-layer structure — judgment layer, submitter layer, on-chain settlement contract — combining AI analysis capabilities with traditional verification mechanisms, allowing applications to access both structured and unstructured data.
Why is this design important? Because applications like prediction markets and RWA are often not about "lacking a data point," but about "lacking a complete data chain" — the need for full traceability from raw information to final conclusion.