2025-12-27 17:27:40

The 'incoming ETF + current low prices' story hits different than 'it's underperforming so it'll bounce back eventually.' One's got actual catalyst momentum. The other? Just math hoping to work itself out. When you're positioning for moves, the first narrative actually moves money.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Degen4Breakfast

· 10h ago

ETF is here + at a low price point, this is the real catalyst. It's much more reliable than those stories of "bouncing back after a decline." The latter is just a self-deceiving mathematical game.

View OriginalReply0

MoodFollowsPrice

· 10h ago

ETFs are coming, and prices are low again. This kind of story really attracts money, much more reliable than "it will rebound after falling." The latter is just self-comfort.

View OriginalReply0

P2ENotWorking

· 10h ago

The ETF narrative is indeed much more solid than "waiting for a rebound"... The former is a genuine catalyst with real money, while the latter is purely self-comforting.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunterZhang

· 10h ago

The argument that ETF+low price can really move money is just talk. The rebound theory is just air.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-40edb63b

· 10h ago

The idea of ETF+ low price is indeed more solid than "it will rebound sooner or later after falling." The former involves real money flowing, while the latter relies purely on probability.

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 10h ago

Bro, this is the real launch window — stories with actual catalysts are what drive capital flow, while fantasizing about a rebound is just gambling on probabilities.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-9f682d4c

· 10h ago

Really, only narratives with actual catalysts can attract money; the approach of simply betting on a rebound should have been phased out long ago.

View OriginalReply0