2025-12-27 17:25:30

Perpetual contract security audits have new developments. Recently, a "Decentralized Perpetual Contract Security Audit Guide" was published. This document provides an in-depth analysis of the core architecture of on-chain contracts, potential risk points, and systematic audit methodologies.

It mainly targets three groups: auditors, protocol developers, and security researchers. The guide covers core topics such as architecture design evaluation, smart contract risk identification, and common vulnerability patterns, helping you systematically understand the security baseline of DeFi perpetual trading.

If you are involved in security auditing, developing decentralized trading protocols, or focusing on Web3 security research, this resource is worth referencing—the methodologies and checklists included can significantly enhance the professionalism of your audits.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

9 Likes

Reward
9
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AlphaLeaker

· 14h ago

Finally, someone has systematized the pitfalls of perpetual contracts; previously, each audit was done separately. Audit guidelines are essentially an insurance policy against rug pulls—keep it safe. The real question is how many protocols will actually follow this, question mark.

View OriginalReply0

NotFinancialAdvice

· 14h ago

Perpetual contracts are making headlines again? Quickly take a look at this guide --- The audit guide has been updated again. I’ve been saying that DeFi risks are high for a reason --- Wait, is this information helpful for developers? Then I should have checked out that project of mine earlier... --- Another architecture assessment and vulnerability identification. It feels like perpetual contracts will never be fully fixed --- Are these audit methodologies really effective? Or are they just theoretical talk --- I should save this. Understanding the safety bottom line of perpetual trading is still important --- Alright, it seems this guide is quite practical. Checklists and such can definitely come in handy --- Perpetual contract security? Easy to say, but in practice, it’s still a mess --- New standards for contract audits? Keeping up with the pace is really exhausting --- Is this guide a solid industry confirmation or just another bluff

View OriginalReply0

StakeOrRegret

· 14h ago

Here's another safety guide. Is this one really reliable? This kind of systematic approach should have been around earlier; perpetual contracts have too many pitfalls. Use the audit checklist directly—nice, nice. Another security framework. How many real attacks can it actually prevent... I think DeFi trading protocols are always behind hackers when it comes to security. If this guide were truly useful, it should have appeared much earlier. Interesting, finally someone has clearly outlined the risk points of perpetual contracts.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHustler

· 14h ago

Perpetual contracts have a new guide again? Honestly, I tend to save these kinds of documents, but not many people actually use them. The audit checklist has grown longer, it feels like new pitfalls keep appearing... need to follow up. Wait, did they focus on anything new this time? It feels like the strategies are pretty much the same? Finally, there's a systematic methodology. It's much better than before when everyone was working independently. This thing is a must-read for developers, or else you're just handing money to hackers.

View OriginalReply0

ForumLurker

· 14h ago

Wow, finally there's a reliable audit guide. The previous contract vulnerabilities were really scary. --- Auditors and developers must read this to avoid accidents again. --- This thing is a timely rain for us security folks. --- There are so many pitfalls in DeFi perpetual contracts; a systematic methodology is necessary. --- The previous project teams really weren't attentive; now that there are standards, they must be followed. --- Checklists are actually very important; they can prevent many basic vulnerabilities. --- Speaking of which, does having this guide mean the industry is becoming more regulated? --- Architecture design evaluation is the most easily overlooked area; it seems we need to pay more attention.

View OriginalReply0