A long-time reader once approached me, saying he had been liquidated twice and his account was down to only 3,200 USD. He wanted to make one last attempt. I didn’t give any promises of a short position; I only advised him to follow a complete position sizing model combined with a rolling position strategy.



In the first two months, his gains were modest. He strictly followed each take-profit and stop-loss. But starting from the third month, his funds began to grow rapidly—by day 92, his account exceeded 185,000 USD. Throughout the process, he never took on heavy positions or experienced significant drawdowns.

This is not an isolated case. Over the past year, I have repeatedly validated this "rolling + position control + rhythm judgment" method: used by myself, by friends, and practiced by many traders, with extremely stable results. The data speaks for itself—some went from 4,800 USD to 76,000 USD in less than 60 days; others turned 700 USD into 19,000 USD, managing risk with low capital to the extreme; some even recovered to consistent profitability after losing money for three consecutive months using this approach.

In simple terms, this strategy boils down to three key points:

**Stable Positioning and Risk Control**—never risking more than 20% of total capital per trade, with fixed stop-loss within 3%

**Trade Only the Main Trend**—avoid trading in choppy zones, ignore news-driven volatility, focus on technical breakouts and continuation trades

**Weekly Review to Find Rhythm**—record profits and losses, analyze entry and exit logic, identify high-probability patterns, and repeat execution

The problem now is that many people have limited funds and are still messing around—full positions, averaging down on losses, chasing after gains—always trial and error, never achieving consistent growth. The market is right there, but you’ve never built a system capable of compound growth.

I don’t encourage gambling to turn things around, but the fact is, small capital can definitely grow if you abandon impulsive trading. You may not believe me, but you must accept this fact: as long as you avoid liquidation, your account has a chance to grow.

If you still have 2,000 USD or 3,000 USD and don’t want to repeat the same mistakes, it’s better to calmly try this method for three months. No need to chase hot trends, no need to frequently switch coins—just use position control and rhythm. What you lack in this market isn’t effort or opportunity, but a systematic approach that can help you achieve stable profits.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CoconutWaterBoyvip
· 14h ago
92 days from 3,200 to 185,000. The data is indeed impressive, but I really want to know if that guy can still stick to the plan now... Rolling positions sounds simple, but the hard part is resisting human nature. Very few people can endure the first two months of flatness.
View OriginalReply0
FUDwatchervip
· 14h ago
That's right, discipline is indeed the only way for small funds to turn around.
View OriginalReply0
ColdWalletAnxietyvip
· 14h ago
92 days from 3,200 to 185,000? Honestly, it's a bit hard to believe, but the strategy of position control + stop-loss really works. I'm also practicing it myself, but the execution is just too difficult.
View OriginalReply0
0xSleepDeprivedvip
· 14h ago
Damn, 3200U flipped to 185,000? That's some intense data. It doesn't sound like the usual "I have a secret" approach, but controlling 20% position size is indeed very important. The key is that most people just can't hold back; knowing they should cut losses, but still adding to their position. It seems the hardest part isn't finding the trend, but being able to stick to not gambling for three months. This kind of stable compound interest strategy sounds simple, but executing it really depends on self-discipline. Thinking about small funds, I’ve seen similar rolling position logic before, and it’s definitely more reliable than going all-in recklessly. But how did they catch the 92-day cycle? Do they have to look at specific technical levels? Damn, another full-position story. After hearing so much, some people still want to go all in.
View OriginalReply0
JustHereForMemesvip
· 14h ago
Really, from 3,200 to 185,000? That number sounds outrageous but not entirely impossible... The key point is still that one sentence: stop-loss and it's over. Easier said than done; execution is hell... Most people get wiped out because of the phrase "this time is different." I've heard many people boast about a 20% position with a 3% stop-loss, but how many can truly detach their emotions from trading... The core of the rolling position strategy is not to gamble, but this thing tests human nature... Most people have already blown up two or three times before compound interest kicks in. It looks simple, but executing it is deadly.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)