Major exchanges don't chase hype—they chase real fundamentals. When evaluating projects for listing, here's what the criteria typically looks like:
Authentic trading volume stands first, not artificially inflated numbers. Then comes holder base expansion that shows genuine adoption, paired with organic community engagement. Token distribution matters too—projects with concentrated holdings face more scrutiny. Across all of this, sustained market attention and multi-exchange presence signal credibility.
This is exactly why certain emerging tokens are gaining traction with on-chain analysts right now. The metrics don't lie—liquidity depth, holder diversity, and cross-platform momentum reveal what's building real momentum versus what's just noise.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
11 Likes
Reward
11
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
SigmaBrain
· 10h ago
In plain terms, data doesn't lie. Projects that are truly listed on mainstream exchanges have already been thoroughly analyzed and exposed through on-chain analysis.
View OriginalReply0
BlockBargainHunter
· 10h ago
Basically, it's about looking at data rather than stories. Fake costs for real trading volume, holder diversification, and liquidity are too high, and exchanges have long figured out this set of tricks.
View OriginalReply0
CrossChainMessenger
· 10h ago
Well said, finally someone is speaking the truth. Projects that rely on hype to get onto exchanges will eventually fail; the data will speak for itself.
View OriginalReply0
0xDreamChaser
· 10h ago
That's right, but it all depends on real data. Don't be fooled by those fake trading volumes.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWallflower
· 10h ago
Exactly, projects that rely on data manipulation to climb the ranks should have been phased out long ago, and exchanges aren't fools. The distribution of held tokens is obvious at a glance, and trying to pretend otherwise is futile...
Major exchanges don't chase hype—they chase real fundamentals. When evaluating projects for listing, here's what the criteria typically looks like:
Authentic trading volume stands first, not artificially inflated numbers. Then comes holder base expansion that shows genuine adoption, paired with organic community engagement. Token distribution matters too—projects with concentrated holdings face more scrutiny. Across all of this, sustained market attention and multi-exchange presence signal credibility.
This is exactly why certain emerging tokens are gaining traction with on-chain analysts right now. The metrics don't lie—liquidity depth, holder diversity, and cross-platform momentum reveal what's building real momentum versus what's just noise.