2025-12-27 16:22:43

Lighter project's TGE just concluded, and the anti-witch results were announced yesterday. I listened to some friends from the studio talk about it— the witch detection coverage is basically around 70-90%. The key point is that the anti-attack effort is quite strong; some say they have countered over 200,000 U, which is indeed intense.

There’s also a detail being dug up online: the account that suddenly opened champagne to celebrate earlier seems to be a new account, and this time Lighter’s aggressive witch detection might be somewhat related to that incident. Many communities are still criticizing this guy, and the buzz is quite high. With such a large anti-attack ratio, participants’ mindsets are probably a mix of various feelings.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

LiquidatorFlash

· 12h ago

A coverage rate of 70-90 indicates that the risk control mechanism has triggered the threshold, and the anti-repurchase amount of over 200,000 USDT... I am very familiar with the smell of liquidation risk. As for opening champagne on a new account, how should I put it, Lighter's move this time is indeed quite aggressive. However, if this continues, will the next round lead to even higher lending position risks? We'll have to see.

View OriginalReply0

BTCRetirementFund

· 12h ago

Over 200,000 U directly confiscated. The level of anti-rebound effort is indeed incredible. How many people must be crying their eyes out?

View OriginalReply0

AirdropHunterXM

· 12h ago

Over 200,000 USDT refunded, how fierce is that? But it's deserved; witches should be investigated.

View OriginalReply0

LiquiditySurfer

· 13h ago

Over 200,000 USDT anti-reload, this method is indeed ruthless. However, with detection rates of 70-90%, it still depends on how serious the team is. That guy popping champagne, he really shot himself in the foot. With such fierce anti-reload measures, those who profit definitely feel great, while those who lose probably curse. Lighter's move this time is a lesson for the witches. Over 200,000 USDT just gone like that, how uncomfortable must that be? By the way, does this kind of last-minute witch-hunting really work that well? It feels like every project now has to stage a big anti-reload show, truly exhausting the aesthetic.

View OriginalReply0