2025-12-27 16:21:49

There is an old problem in the AI field that everyone has encountered—

Parameters seem fine. The fundraising pitch is perfect. But when it really runs? Suddenly, all kinds of reasons pop up: volatility, throttling, maintenance, queuing.

Sounds familiar, right?

The gap between promises and delivery has caused many teams to stumble. Weeks of effort go down the drain, and trust is lost along with it.

Our idea is actually very straightforward—computing resources should earn trust like traditional infrastructure. How? Through a stable delivery record, clear service terms, and taking responsibility when issues arise. It’s that simple.

Those "paper-based computing power" promises—everyone who’s been burned knows. No matter how good the hype, if you can’t deliver, it’s all useless.

When did you start to realize that metrics and parameters aren’t actually that important? Maybe it was the time when the promised performance didn’t appear as expected.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

15 Likes

Reward
15
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

HypotheticalLiquidator

· 14h ago

The paper computing power is just before a chain reaction of liquidations; once the risk control threshold is broken, it directly triggers a domino effect.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-3824aa38

· 14h ago

It's too true, constantly seeing these "paper computing power" scams. --- The gap between promises and delivery is so outrageous, I've long been numb. --- That's why I don't trust projects that boast about fundraising so much. --- Stable delivery sounds simple in theory, but there are always excuses when it comes to actually doing it. --- I've stepped on too many pits; now I always cut the parameters in half. --- Reliable resource providers tend to be less showy and just get the work done. --- Those who are always maintaining and queuing, I've seen through them long ago. --- When will there be truly responsible computing power services? --- Good-looking metrics are useless; what's key is whether it can really run. --- Trust, once broken, is hard to mend.

View OriginalReply0

DataPickledFish

· 14h ago

Old news, anyway PPT will always be the most stable --- Same old story, grandiose words but when it crashes, they just blame maintenance --- Haha, isn't this the experience I had last time being scammed? I'm still waiting for their compensation --- The concept of paper computing power is brilliant, referring to certain projects --- How to regain trust? Even a bankruptcy might not be handled well --- Promises and delivery, haha, in the crypto world, I haven't seen anyone truly do it in ten years --- The question is, who will regulate this "responsibility"? --- Does it have to be so heartbreaking? But it really hits the point

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeNFTs

· 14h ago

Paper computing power is just a joke, really, after a few runs you'll understand. --- Same old story, a set of fundraising PPTs, but when it comes to actual use, all kinds of excuses, so annoying. --- This is what Web3 should look like, don't bother with all those superficial things, stability comes first. --- Everyone who has stepped on the坑knows, who can't brag, delivering results is the real skill. --- Damn, the computing power sector has always been so chaotic, let's see who dares to take real responsibility.

View OriginalReply0