A new generation of sovereign infrastructure is now available, bringing real options to projects tired of compromise. Why accept limitations when you can access a framework designed to grow with your needs from the beginning? The key lies in progressive autonomy—kick off with shared security infrastructure to move fast, then transition to your own dedicated security model as you scale. This approach eliminates the false choice between speed and independence. Teams get the best of both worlds: rapid deployment without sacrificing long-term control. It's a fundamental rethink of how chains approach growth and decentralization.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GhostInTheChain
· 9h ago
ngl, this sounds like trying to sell new stuff to anxious project teams, but the progress bar mode does have some merit...
View OriginalReply0
TokenomicsDetective
· 13h ago
Sounds like a scam again. Shared security basically still relies on others. Truly independent? Hmm.
View OriginalReply0
ser_ngmi
· 13h ago
Sounds good, but can it be implemented? It feels like the same old familiar stuff.
View OriginalReply0
TeaTimeTrader
· 13h ago
Sounds good, but how many can truly achieve progressive autonomy? Most are just putting lipstick on a pig.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunterZhang
· 13h ago
It sounds like another "getting both the fish and the bear's paw" story. I've heard this rhetoric too many times. The real question is, how many can actually survive for more than two years?
View OriginalReply0
MetaverseVagabond
· 13h ago
Sounds good, but can it really be done? There have been many such promises before.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizard
· 13h ago
Sounds good. The idea of progressive autonomy indeed breaks the previous deadlock of an either-or situation. However, the real question is how many projects can withstand the transition from shared security to independent models, and how to ensure risk control during this process.
View OriginalReply0
ChainPoet
· 14h ago
Well said, finally someone dares to face this issue directly. The step-by-step transition from shared security to autonomous security is truly a practical solution.
A new generation of sovereign infrastructure is now available, bringing real options to projects tired of compromise. Why accept limitations when you can access a framework designed to grow with your needs from the beginning? The key lies in progressive autonomy—kick off with shared security infrastructure to move fast, then transition to your own dedicated security model as you scale. This approach eliminates the false choice between speed and independence. Teams get the best of both worlds: rapid deployment without sacrificing long-term control. It's a fundamental rethink of how chains approach growth and decentralization.