Recently, I’ve been discussing the same topic with several friends in the investment circle—the impact of subsidy policy changes on the market. I’ve also organized some of my observations to share with everyone.



**When will the subsidy rollback be most intense?**

Honestly, the first quarter of next year will be a real test. This year’s subsidy policies provided strong support for the low- and mid-end price segments, which directly depleted some purchasing power. Next year, that purchasing power will be gone, and market pressure can be imagined. The reaction in the secondary market has already been quite obvious; stock prices across the entire automotive sector have adjusted sufficiently, and everyone is now observing. After talking with a few researchers, honestly, they aren’t that optimistic, but within this pessimistic outlook, there might be opportunities. The key is to keep tracking policy trends and sales data.

**Will subsidies really disappear next year?**

They won’t disappear outright. The support framework for ultra-long-term government bonds is still in place, and subsidies won’t fall off a cliff suddenly. But I think the focus will definitely shift. This is easy to understand—now that the penetration rate in the whole vehicle market has exceeded 50%, it’s less necessary to stimulate sales solely through subsidies. Future subsidies are more likely to focus on product quality, technological innovation, and brand building, rather than simply prioritizing volume.

**Where will the market go?**

This is a complex question. On one hand, the market indeed faces slowing growth pressure; on the other hand, the competitive landscape of the entire industry is evolving rapidly, and product iteration speeds are increasing. For investors, this period requires more refined judgment—identifying which companies can maintain competitiveness despite subsidy reductions, and which are still relying on subsidies to survive.

I believe the real investment opportunity isn’t in the pessimism itself, but in how to find certainty amid change. Although the changes in subsidy policies seem to bring pressure, for companies with genuine product strength and brand influence, it might actually be an opportunity—policies no longer distribute subsidies equally, and the market will more truly reflect the value of products.

So whether the vehicle sector will improve by 2026 still depends on how industry participants respond. Short-term pressure is foreseeable, but the long-term logic requires ongoing observation.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomMinervip
· 13h ago
Next year's Q1 really needs to be watched carefully. The mid-to-low end segment has indeed been heavily overextended. But to be fair, in pessimistic expectations, those who are mining are tough people. I agree with the point about continuously tracking policy trends.
View OriginalReply0
SmartMoneyWalletvip
· 13h ago
Come on, the flow of funds from subsidy cuts can already be seen from the distribution of chips, and these researchers are still slow to realize it.
View OriginalReply0
RektDetectivevip
· 13h ago
Next year's Q1 definitely needs to be closely watched. As subsidies decline, everyone's true nature will be revealed. Those relying on subsidies to survive are doomed, while those with real product strength are actually set to take off. Finding opportunities in pessimistic expectations sounds easy, but few actually take action.
View OriginalReply0
ProveMyZKvip
· 13h ago
The first quarter of next year will indeed be tough. Subsidies are like a shot of adrenaline; once they stop, there's bleeding. The companies that rely on subsidies are really panicking; the market will ruthlessly weed them out. Wait, think about it the other way around—companies with real strength might actually take off? The tapering of subsidies = a more authentic market. I agree with this idea. The true test will be in the first quarter. I'm waiting for the big show to begin.
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyMinervip
· 13h ago
The first quarter really needs to be watched closely; subsidy reductions are no small matter. It feels like a reshuffle is coming next year. Let's see who truly has product strength. Everyone is right, but the key is to wait for the data to come out to know for sure. Those who rely on subsidies are about to panic; a period of dramatic change has arrived. I don't quite understand this logic. Can the quality innovation really keep up? Short-term discomfort is certain, but opportunities are also within the chaos. Automobile stocks have fallen quite badly these past two days; it feels like the bottom hasn't come yet. Finding opportunities in pessimism is easy to say, but when it really happens, you'll know how difficult it is.
View OriginalReply0
NotFinancialAdviservip
· 13h ago
Next year's first quarter is really going to be a bloody storm. Subsidies, whether a little or a lot, Those who rely on subsidies to survive... just wait to be eliminated, there's nothing more to say. Even after penetration rate surpasses 50%, they keep piling on subsidies. Isn't that just drinking poison to quench thirst? What good words about product strength and brand power? It's all about who can survive until the policy shifts. I'm tired of listening to observation data. It's better to just bet on one or two leading players.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)