Recently, I've been looking into some infrastructure projects that haven't been fully explored yet and have noticed an interesting phenomenon: the bottlenecks of many public chains are not at the performance ceiling, but rather stem from the initial choice of execution model being off track.
Some time ago, I revisited a Layer1 solution that focuses on native parallel execution, and this technical approach is quite clear. The V4 testnet has already gone live, but to be honest, the community's enthusiasm isn't very high, and there aren't many discussions.
From an investment research perspective, I am particularly interested in these points: Does the architecture design of the execution model truly fit the current application ecosystem? How much actual performance improvement does the native parallel execution scheme have compared to traditional sequential execution? Can the testnet data support the performance after mainnet deployment? These are all critical factors in determining whether it can truly become the cornerstone of the next round of infrastructure.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
ConfusedWhale
· 5h ago
This parallel execution approach is indeed quite profound, but the low popularity also indicates a problem. Truly useful things are often buried like this.
View OriginalReply0
SnapshotBot
· 6h ago
Low popularity is actually an opportunity. These niche infrastructure projects are often the real treasure maps.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-0717ab66
· 6h ago
Low popularity simply indicates that it hasn't been fully priced in yet, and this is the opportunity. However, the execution model sounds good in theory, but actually implementing it is another matter.
View OriginalReply0
FOMOSapien
· 6h ago
Niche projects often have real value, but the idea of parallel execution has been around for many years. Truly implementable ones are few and far between.
View OriginalReply0
DegenWhisperer
· 6h ago
The idea that execution models are biased is spot on; many chains are indeed driven by pseudo-demand. However, parallel execution sounds easy, but actually implementing it is another matter entirely.
Recently, I've been looking into some infrastructure projects that haven't been fully explored yet and have noticed an interesting phenomenon: the bottlenecks of many public chains are not at the performance ceiling, but rather stem from the initial choice of execution model being off track.
Some time ago, I revisited a Layer1 solution that focuses on native parallel execution, and this technical approach is quite clear. The V4 testnet has already gone live, but to be honest, the community's enthusiasm isn't very high, and there aren't many discussions.
From an investment research perspective, I am particularly interested in these points: Does the architecture design of the execution model truly fit the current application ecosystem? How much actual performance improvement does the native parallel execution scheme have compared to traditional sequential execution? Can the testnet data support the performance after mainnet deployment? These are all critical factors in determining whether it can truly become the cornerstone of the next round of infrastructure.