Recently, these kinds of legends are indeed everywhere. Take a popular coin story as an example—claiming 400x returns? Just look at the highest spot price, which is only around $77.24. The real question is: who can actually buy this coin at the $0.2 price level? Check the on-chain transaction records, the trading depth and the number of participants during that period, which can basically explain everything. Behind such outrageous multiples, there is often extremely thin liquidity and post-hoc narratives. Every year, the crypto world produces a few "myths," but the chances of truly reproducing them? Very few. Rationally analyzing the data is much more reliable than chasing after legends.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
10 Likes
Reward
10
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
RetailTherapist
· 17h ago
Sis, there's no depth at all, just buying loneliness.
View OriginalReply0
MysteriousZhang
· 12-26 13:55
Nothing beats on-chain data; once you dig deep, the true nature is revealed.
View OriginalReply0
SchroedingerAirdrop
· 12-26 13:54
Exactly right, that's the way it is. Can you get it for 0.2? You're kidding, right?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidatedDreams
· 12-26 13:53
Bro, you're right. Once you dig deep, the truth is revealed.
---
That 0.2 price point, no one is actually selling at that level; it's all just stories.
---
It's always the same story. On-chain data doesn't lie.
---
Really, hearing about 400x returns is just talk; don't take it seriously.
---
With such poor liquidity, what's there to boast about? Wake up, everyone.
---
The problem is everyone wants to believe, so the legend never dies.
---
Just check on the chain, you'll see. Participants are scarce. Who's to blame?
---
These kinds of coins appear every year. Why do people still get scammed?
---
The data is right there. Why chase after the hype?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 12-26 13:52
Honestly, liquidity is really a tumor. Seeing millions of coins in the account, a single trade causes a 50% slippage.
View OriginalReply0
SilentAlpha
· 12-26 13:45
Really, if you do a deep on-chain investigation, everything becomes clear. Back then, the trading volume was extremely sparse.
---
400x? I wonder who the hell could actually catch the dip at that price.
---
It's always the same story, armchair quarterbacks explaining everything as if they were right, so annoying.
---
Just check the trading records, isn't that enough? Don't get caught holding the bag, brother.
---
Such poor liquidity and still have the nerve to boast, wake up everyone.
---
Stories like this are as common as flies now, just listen and don't take them seriously.
---
It's impossible to buy at 0.2, that's all nonsense.
---
In the crypto world, a few "myths" pop up each year, and only a handful can truly be called bottom-fishing opportunities.
---
If you want to make money, you still need to look at the data. Don't believe those bullshit narratives.
View OriginalReply0
DegenDreamer
· 12-26 13:42
I've seen through this trick a long time ago; liquidity checks will expose it immediately.
Recently, these kinds of legends are indeed everywhere. Take a popular coin story as an example—claiming 400x returns? Just look at the highest spot price, which is only around $77.24. The real question is: who can actually buy this coin at the $0.2 price level? Check the on-chain transaction records, the trading depth and the number of participants during that period, which can basically explain everything. Behind such outrageous multiples, there is often extremely thin liquidity and post-hoc narratives. Every year, the crypto world produces a few "myths," but the chances of truly reproducing them? Very few. Rationally analyzing the data is much more reliable than chasing after legends.