2025-12-26 13:23:36

The core issue facing Kaito is not the technology itself, but strategic missteps in this wave of infoFi. The practice of treating users differently directly undermines its competitiveness in the information finance field, and this lack of transparency is fatal in the Web3 community. Once users feel they are being treated unfairly, rebuilding trust becomes very difficult. In the current environment where many information projects are rushing in, Kaito needs to seriously reflect on its governance mechanism; otherwise, a decline in market share and ecological influence is inevitable.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
6
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

QuorumVoter

· 1h ago

Treating users unequally? That's basically asking for trouble in Web3. Once trust is broken, it can never be fully restored.

View OriginalReply0

DAOplomacy

· 12h ago

ngl the whole "governance reflection" thing is what they always say right before the ship sinks... kaito's transparency problem is like, arguably a symptom of deeper stakeholder misalignment issues, ya know? path dependency is real here

Reply0

potentially_notable