Recently, many users have been sharing their annual data reports, which has sparked some reflections. In the face of an increasingly complex digital environment, security issues are becoming more prominent.



Especially with the emergence of numerous AI-related scams. In traditional models, AI operates within opaque centralized servers, allowing hackers to secretly tamper with operational commands in the background—original "investment instructions" could be replaced with "transfers to attackers." This black box operation leaves significant security vulnerabilities.

In contrast, transparent and verifiable solutions are different. Take Mira as an example; its core philosophy is "Reject the black box, verify authenticity throughout"—by recording transparent on-chain records and verifiable execution processes, every step can be tracked and audited, greatly reducing the risk of covert manipulation. Users can view the complete execution path of instructions in real-time, ensuring they haven't been tampered with by intermediaries.

This shift from "trust in the black box" to "verified transparency" could be an important direction for future AI applications in the crypto space.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
OnchainFortuneTellervip
· 6h ago
Black box AI has long deserved to die; on-chain verifiability is the true way. --- Another centralized trap. When will the entire network awaken? --- Mira's logic is indeed perfect; every step can be verified, no more fear of backend secretly changing instructions. --- To put it simply, don't leave backdoors for hackers; transparency is better than anything. --- Sharing annual data immediately attracts attention; just thinking about it is scary. It's time to change the approach. --- Verification transparency should have been standard long ago; stop using black box methods. --- With such hardcore on-chain records, why do some still believe in the flowery words of centralization? --- I can directly pass on AI instructions that lack traceability; no matter how attractive the returns, I won't touch them.
View OriginalReply0
DefiVeteranvip
· 6h ago
Black box AI should have died long ago; centralized servers are just ticking time bombs. On-chain verifiability sounds easy in theory, but how many have actually been implemented? Having been scammed, I now understand what safety really means, haha. This is what Web3 should be doing—stop with the empty promises.
View OriginalReply0
GasDevourervip
· 7h ago
The black box is the original sin; let's see the true nature on the chain.
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterXvip
· 7h ago
Black box AI is indeed a ticking time bomb; I can't trust that kind of backend operation. It sounds interesting to verify on-chain, but we'll have to see how it performs in real-world applications. Centralized systems will eventually fail; this time, I guess I was right.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)