From a purely storytelling perspective, RIVER can indeed be packaged at $5, $10, or even higher. The problem is, everyone involved in trading understands — in the end, it all comes down to how the market moves and where the funds flow.
RIVER’s candlestick chart actually reveals the full answer. This is a typical pattern of "event-driven hype — story overextension — returning to a reasonable price range." It is still in the process of adjusting downward and is far from the start of a new upward trend.
**Early Accumulation Stage** When TGE first launched, it was consolidating around $1-2. At that time, trading was quite rhythmic: low circulating supply, cautious market sentiment, and no rush to buy or sell. Funds were willing to pay a premium for this narrative, but no one was blindly chasing the high.
**Peak Formation Stage** As it surged toward nearly $10, all technical signals pointed to the same conclusion — the trading was already too crowded. Funding rates began to rise, long positions in perpetual contracts grew heavier, and arbitrage opportunities appeared between various RIVER tokens. Some even boasted outlandish claims like "hundreds or thousands of percent annualized low-risk returns."
**Narrative Decline Stage** Then, the turning point came. RIVER started to decline in batches, with new lows constantly being made. It was weak during rebounds and fierce during drops — a typical sign of loosening chips, with the market makers quietly reducing their positions. After the price fell into the $3-5 range, trading volume noticeably shrank, indicating that active traders had mostly exited. What remained were traders fighting each other and holders reducing their positions due to unlocking pressures. At this point, RIVER had shifted from a "market hotspot" to a "high-volatility speculative asset."
**So why do I say it’s only worth $1?**
In the long run, the market doesn’t price based on stories but around the "valuation center." RIVER’s central valuation is most likely locked in the $1-2 range, for simple reasons:
- The large amount of chips accumulated early on are cost-basis here - This price roughly covers: the protocol’s current revenue + growth expectations + token unlock discounts
As long as the protocol itself doesn’t undergo a fundamental change in revenue, a price hovering around $3-5 will not attract new money to "hold long-term as shareholders." When new funds dry up, stories become stale, and sentiment leaks out, the market will naturally pull the price back to the historical cost zone and reasonable valuation zone — around $1.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
LowCapGemHunter
· 7h ago
The story is over, the funds have already run away, just wait to get back $1.
View OriginalReply0
NFTDreamer
· 8h ago
No matter how good the story is, it can't beat the influence of funds. I see through RIVER's套路 this time.
Waiting to buy at the bottom of 1 dollar, really.
It's another classic bubble cycle, and the high-point bagholders are still in a daze.
The big players have already quietly run away, and even the rebounds are just fake falls.
The protocol has no actual income, so what valuation are you talking about? It's just a game of hot potato.
Speaking of which, who dares to buy the dip when a coin drops from ten dollars to one dollar... the risk is just too high.
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 8h ago
Another storytelling token, now it has fallen to this level and still claims to be worth only 1 dollar. If I had known, I wouldn't have chased that high wave.
The problem is that we have to wait until the sentiment is completely exhausted. Who knows how much longer it will keep falling?
View OriginalReply0
ForkTongue
· 8h ago
Very insightful. This set of tactics for harvesting profits is indeed a continuous cycle.
I've also seen quite a few cases where the story doesn't match reality. Had I known the big players would act when it hit $3, I would have anticipated it.
By the way, can the $1 level hold, or will it continue to drop?
View OriginalReply0
HodlKumamon
· 8h ago
熊熊 just calculated the funding rate, and this pattern is indeed a typical signal of the big players reducing their positions... Wait, I'm a bit nervous about the story reaching $1.
Is $1-2 the real price range that can attract new money? If so, the holder's mindset at 3-5 must be really崩溃.
Honestly, would it be better to dollar-cost average around $1?
View OriginalReply0
UnluckyValidator
· 8h ago
It's the same old trick again, the story ends with a drop every time
People have already left, no matter how good the story is, it's useless
The part about chips loosening up is spot on, the big players have already quietly exited
Is $1 the bottom line? I think it needs to go even lower
The early group who bought at $1-2 really made a profit, those entering now are just taking over the positions
After this round of emotional outflow, it's indeed impossible to return to the high levels
Reasonable valuation is just this little, maybe a bit too pessimistic
Where is the true valuation of RIVER
From a purely storytelling perspective, RIVER can indeed be packaged at $5, $10, or even higher. The problem is, everyone involved in trading understands — in the end, it all comes down to how the market moves and where the funds flow.
RIVER’s candlestick chart actually reveals the full answer. This is a typical pattern of "event-driven hype — story overextension — returning to a reasonable price range." It is still in the process of adjusting downward and is far from the start of a new upward trend.
**Early Accumulation Stage**
When TGE first launched, it was consolidating around $1-2. At that time, trading was quite rhythmic: low circulating supply, cautious market sentiment, and no rush to buy or sell. Funds were willing to pay a premium for this narrative, but no one was blindly chasing the high.
**Peak Formation Stage**
As it surged toward nearly $10, all technical signals pointed to the same conclusion — the trading was already too crowded. Funding rates began to rise, long positions in perpetual contracts grew heavier, and arbitrage opportunities appeared between various RIVER tokens. Some even boasted outlandish claims like "hundreds or thousands of percent annualized low-risk returns."
**Narrative Decline Stage**
Then, the turning point came. RIVER started to decline in batches, with new lows constantly being made. It was weak during rebounds and fierce during drops — a typical sign of loosening chips, with the market makers quietly reducing their positions. After the price fell into the $3-5 range, trading volume noticeably shrank, indicating that active traders had mostly exited. What remained were traders fighting each other and holders reducing their positions due to unlocking pressures. At this point, RIVER had shifted from a "market hotspot" to a "high-volatility speculative asset."
**So why do I say it’s only worth $1?**
In the long run, the market doesn’t price based on stories but around the "valuation center." RIVER’s central valuation is most likely locked in the $1-2 range, for simple reasons:
- The large amount of chips accumulated early on are cost-basis here
- This price roughly covers: the protocol’s current revenue + growth expectations + token unlock discounts
As long as the protocol itself doesn’t undergo a fundamental change in revenue, a price hovering around $3-5 will not attract new money to "hold long-term as shareholders." When new funds dry up, stories become stale, and sentiment leaks out, the market will naturally pull the price back to the historical cost zone and reasonable valuation zone — around $1.