2025-12-26 12:22:07

Recently, many tokens in the BSC ecosystem have indeed entered a period of adjustment. This is not hard to understand — given the current market environment, it is a very normal phenomenon.

The core issue lies in liquidity. Funds are clearly shrinking and continuously being drawn away by new hot targets, causing a number of community-driven projects to experience "funds transfer." During such a phase, a weakening price trend is almost inevitable and does not mean that a project has suddenly become worse.

But there is a more noteworthy point: when a project is "neglected" or ignored, has the community really dispersed? This is the real dividing line.

Currently, people are still here, and things are still progressing. This already indicates the problem. Taking it slow is actually okay; the key is to hold the formation. Communities that can endure during a bear market often have stronger rebound potential in the next round of market cycles.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

12 Likes

Reward
12
9
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

SingleForYears

· 6h ago

Liquidity exhaustion is a tired phrase; the key is who can endure it. The community not dispersing is the real key; at lower prices, nothing else matters. Projects that hold on do rebound quickly; history has proven this countless times. The real test is not the decline percentage, but whether people are still working.

View OriginalReply0

RetroHodler91

· 14h ago

Liquidity, in simple terms, is a game of funds. The one who can hold on until the end wins. The real test is not the price, but whether people's hearts are scattered or not. I am optimistic about those projects that are still focused on building; when the next wave comes, they will definitely turn the tables. Sell when the price is low? That's too weak. If you lack this level of resolve, what are you even playing Web3 for? The key is community stickiness. The recent BSC adjustment has filtered out true believers. By the way, some projects are actually good entry points now; don’t be fooled by the fake price movements. I’ve invested in projects that stick to their communities, betting that this logic is sound. As long as people are still here, there is hope. That’s much better than projects that run away. Indeed, fund transfers are routine operations. The key is who can endure this phase. Take it slow if you need to. At least they are still working, unlike a bunch of projects that have disappeared.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-e87b21ee

· 16h ago

As long as the community is still here, the price is just a passing cloud. The real test is like this—see who can endure until the next wave.

View OriginalReply0

GweiTooHigh

· 12-26 12:52

Basically, it's about squeezing out the water content; what's left are true believers.

View OriginalReply0

CascadingDipBuyer

· 12-26 12:45

Liquidity contraction—I'm tired of hearing this rhetoric. The real question is, who is actually holding the line? Stay optimistic about those still working; low prices are actually an opportunity. As long as the community stays united, that's what matters. Projects on BSC that can hold up during this wave will surge strongly next round. Wait, this logic also applies to other tracks, right? Holding on to bounce back? Then why haven't we seen many actual rebounds?

View OriginalReply0

MoonRocketman

· 12-26 12:41

Liquidity draining at this stage is indeed about filtering out who truly believes and who is just following the hype. An RSI pullback does not mean the project is dead; understanding this logic is crucial. The community is still active, and when the next launch window arrives, the rebound angle coefficient will be very strong. Historical data shows that this is how it works. A depressed price does not equal a fundamental collapse; many people have misunderstood this.

View OriginalReply0

DaoDeveloper

· 12-26 12:39

liquidity drain is just darwinian selection tbh. the projects that keep shipping through the noise? those are the ones with actual incentive alignment. tokenomics design matters way more than price action rn

Reply0

quiet_lurker

· 12-26 12:27

Liquidity transfer indeed is the first thing retail investors feel. But honestly, seeing the community still active makes me feel much more at ease. Many projects start to panic when their prices drop, but actually they just haven't understood this point. In a bear market, it's never technology that gets eliminated, but those whose morale collapses. Keeping the team together is more important than anything else. The difference during the next rebound will be huge. Wait, how many actually stick to it? I feel like many are secretly running away. Weak prices are not scary; a community collapse is the real disaster. This logic makes sense, but when will the current wave of capital contraction ease up? Feels like we have to wait a bit longer.

View OriginalReply0

NestedFox

· 12-26 12:25

Alright, I agree with this point. When liquidity tightens, various projects lose value; it's really just funds seeking new outlets. There's no need to be overly pessimistic. The key is who can hold on; communities that stick through the bear market are indeed more resilient.

View OriginalReply0