In the past two years, a very interesting phenomenon has emerged in the crypto market—funding has clearly differentiated.
Since the approval of the spot Bitcoin ETF, a large influx of compliant capital has poured into BTC. This is a good thing, but the problem is: all the money is concentrated in BTC, and the incremental funds flowing into other sectors have significantly decreased. The data clearly shows how big this difference is—BTC has nearly a 90% increase over two years, and this performance can be considered steady growth in a bull market.
However, looking at Layer2, GameFi, and other once-hot narrative sectors, the situation is completely different. Their retracements generally exceed BTC's gains, and some projects have even experienced alarming declines. Why is this happening? Simply put, market attention and capital have been attracted to BTC, Ethereum, and their ecosystems, which are also developing but indeed haven't received as much incremental funding.
This structural differentiation phenomenon is worth noting. It reflects deeper changes in market sentiment and capital allocation strategies—compliant capital tends to prefer relatively risk-controlled large-cap assets, while risk appetite for small and medium narrative sectors has significantly decreased.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
MergeConflict
· 8h ago
BTC dominates, everything else has to go hungry, this is the current situation.
Layer2 free? That will have to wait until the next cycle.
Regulatory funds are like this, incredibly stable, no one cares about minor narratives.
When Bitcoin takes off, other coins have to be sacrificed; this wave of divergence is truly absolute.
The Ethereum ecosystem has been somewhat awkward these past two years.
View OriginalReply0
FreeMinter
· 8h ago
That's why I'm still holding a few Layer 2 bags... feeling like I've been completely cut off.
As soon as ETFs arrive, it's all institutional players; who still cares about small coins?
Is it only possible to wait for the next narrative restart?
I really can't hold on anymore, BTC is eating the meat alone while others are just sipping the broth.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter420
· 8h ago
BTC vampire, it's just outrageous. When will the altseason come?
That's why I'm still holding onto small coins, betting on a narrative reversal.
Regulatory funds coming in have instead suppressed the ecosystem, it's ironic.
Layer 2 projects are really suffering, feeling forgotten.
The divergence in funding is so severe that small and medium projects are basically out of the game.
View OriginalReply0
OnChainDetective
· 8h ago
nah the real story here is institutional money literally gatekeeping everything except btc... traced the flow patterns and it's textbook capital concentration, not even subtle tbh
Reply0
CryptoCross-TalkClub
· 8h ago
Laughing to death, this is the "wealth gap" in the crypto world. BTC is steadily growing, while small coins are dancing on the floor price.
How are the brothers who bought the dip in Layer2 doing now? I dare not ask.
Regulatory funds are like this, only recognizing BTC as the "big blue chip." GameFi project teams are probably crying in their white papers.
I would call this move "institution-level leek cutting," where are the retail investors' incremental funds? They have already been wiped out in some limit-down boards.
BTC has gained 90% in two years, while some altcoins have plummeted far beyond this number. This is called "shared prosperity," right?
Regulatory capital is prudently allocated, and we retail investors are just responsible for paying tuition fees. Everyone has their own fate.
Take a look at those Layer2 coins in your wallet; it really feels like participating in an endless limit-down show.
View OriginalReply0
DeFiCaffeinator
· 8h ago
BTC Vampire Mode activated, Layer2s can just lie flat
It seems that compliant funds are only looking to bottom fish, making small and medium narratives really difficult
This is probably the cost of institutional entry, so steady to the point of boredom
Wait, are those GameFi projects really hopeless, or are they just being completely overlooked?
Funds are so clearly divided, will there be reverse arbitrage later?
Compliance is truly a double-edged sword; money flows in but the ecosystem is being squeezed out
But on the other hand, a 90% increase in BTC is considered top-tier in a bear market
Projects in small and medium tracks need to find new stories; old routines clearly can't attract money
The Ethereum ecosystem is a bit awkward, caught between BTC and narratives
It seems we have to wait for the next hot topic to emerge to break this deadlock
In the past two years, a very interesting phenomenon has emerged in the crypto market—funding has clearly differentiated.
Since the approval of the spot Bitcoin ETF, a large influx of compliant capital has poured into BTC. This is a good thing, but the problem is: all the money is concentrated in BTC, and the incremental funds flowing into other sectors have significantly decreased. The data clearly shows how big this difference is—BTC has nearly a 90% increase over two years, and this performance can be considered steady growth in a bull market.
However, looking at Layer2, GameFi, and other once-hot narrative sectors, the situation is completely different. Their retracements generally exceed BTC's gains, and some projects have even experienced alarming declines. Why is this happening? Simply put, market attention and capital have been attracted to BTC, Ethereum, and their ecosystems, which are also developing but indeed haven't received as much incremental funding.
This structural differentiation phenomenon is worth noting. It reflects deeper changes in market sentiment and capital allocation strategies—compliant capital tends to prefer relatively risk-controlled large-cap assets, while risk appetite for small and medium narrative sectors has significantly decreased.