Currently, almost every public chain is building ecosystems and investing in funds, but this approach has a problem—relying solely on performance competitions and short-term subsidies makes it difficult to truly accumulate long-term value.



Looking at the practices of some projects makes this clear. Instead of continuing to compete on general public chain performance metrics, it's better to find a real differentiation strategy. For example, some public chains focus on community consensus by building ecosystems through more user-centric approaches, rather than just piling up computing power and rewards.

This mindset actually reflects a reality: in the second half of ecosystem competition, those who can enhance community stickiness will go further. Subsidies will eventually run out, but community trust can be sustained.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 3
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
StakeWhisperervip
· 9h ago
Once the subsidies are gone, it's over. I've seen through this long ago. The truly sustainable public chains still rely on the community to "nurture" them, not on throwing money to create a false prosperity.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-afe07a92vip
· 9h ago
That's right. Currently, many public chains are burning money on subsidies, making it impossible to retain people. Once the subsidies end, everyone disperses.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleDreamervip
· 9h ago
That's right, but projects that are still burning through money just can't be listened to at all.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)