Holding digital assets, buying a cup of coffee takes a lot of hassle – this is the true portrayal of many crypto assets holders. There are valuable tokens lying in the wallet, but when it comes to spending, it requires constant back and forth between various blockchains, different trading platforms, and deposit and withdrawal channels. The gap between assets and consumption is like driving a sports car on a fast highway, but having to stop every few kilometers to adjust direction. It wasn't until I recently encountered payment solutions like Kite that this cumbersome feeling was truly alleviated, as if a universal adapter was connected to the payment system.
For many years, the real bottleneck of crypto payments has not been the lack of coins, but rather the fragmentation of liquidity in all directions. Each chain and each platform is an independent island, and users either have to deeply learn the principles of various cross-chain bridging or manually transfer balances between different Layer 2s. Kite's innovation lies in introducing an intent-driven architecture—users only need to express the most basic demand: "I want to pay," and the system automatically handles the subsequent complex calculations. Cross-chain path planning, liquidity matching, and real-time exchange rate settlement are completed at millisecond speeds in the underlying protocols, allowing drivers to operate without manual intervention, just like an automatic transmission.
From a technical perspective, Kite's competitiveness comes from the extreme utilization of liquidity. It does not simply aggregate the depth of various DEXs, but instead dynamically plans the trading paths through the design of the intention layer. A user's payment request may involve liquidity scheduling across multiple public chains, but the entire process is transparent to the user and the fees are optimized. This solution somewhat addresses the long-standing "payment convenience" issue in the crypto world.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
3
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
tokenomics_truther
· 17h ago
Seriously, I'm very familiar with cross-chain juggling balances, it's so annoying.
---
That's why I always say, what's the use of so many layers? It's better to have a good payment layer.
---
Intent-driven architecture sounds good, but can Kite really solve the problem of exploding gas fees?
---
Haha, it feels like auto tx, finally no need to manually plan the path.
---
Wait, how is optimal liquidity achieved? There won't be any hidden costs, right?
---
I just want to know if this system is safe to use; the history of cross-chain bridges isn't great.
---
In the end, it still solves a pseudo-demand; the real problem is that onramp is too expensive.
---
Not to exaggerate, but buying a coffee really takes about half an hour to calculate the trading path, this solution comes at a good time.
View OriginalReply0
FloorPriceWatcher
· 17h ago
It's really amazing, someone finally articulated this pain point. My old coins are just sitting in the Wallet collecting dust, and to use them I have to hop between three exchanges, it's so annoying. The intention behind Kite's design is truly amazing, it feels like it's giving on-chain payments a "brain".
---
The learning curve for cross-chain bridges is ridiculously steep, not everyone has the time to be an engineer. The idea of automatically handling liquidity matching should have been implemented a long time ago.
---
Wait, is this millisecond-level settlement reliable? Or is it just another new black box risk...
---
Finally, I don't have to manually transfer balances between Arbitrum and Optimism anymore, that process really felt like the Stone Age.
---
Huh? So the problem of fragmented cross-chain liquidity still needs to be solved, right? This isn't a complete solution, is it? Or has Kite really achieved that?
---
This is what I've been saying all along, encryption isn't about lack of money, it's that the money is too fragmented. Having a universal adapter can indeed improve the experience, but doesn't that mean the ecological competition will intensify again...
Holding digital assets, buying a cup of coffee takes a lot of hassle – this is the true portrayal of many crypto assets holders. There are valuable tokens lying in the wallet, but when it comes to spending, it requires constant back and forth between various blockchains, different trading platforms, and deposit and withdrawal channels. The gap between assets and consumption is like driving a sports car on a fast highway, but having to stop every few kilometers to adjust direction. It wasn't until I recently encountered payment solutions like Kite that this cumbersome feeling was truly alleviated, as if a universal adapter was connected to the payment system.
For many years, the real bottleneck of crypto payments has not been the lack of coins, but rather the fragmentation of liquidity in all directions. Each chain and each platform is an independent island, and users either have to deeply learn the principles of various cross-chain bridging or manually transfer balances between different Layer 2s. Kite's innovation lies in introducing an intent-driven architecture—users only need to express the most basic demand: "I want to pay," and the system automatically handles the subsequent complex calculations. Cross-chain path planning, liquidity matching, and real-time exchange rate settlement are completed at millisecond speeds in the underlying protocols, allowing drivers to operate without manual intervention, just like an automatic transmission.
From a technical perspective, Kite's competitiveness comes from the extreme utilization of liquidity. It does not simply aggregate the depth of various DEXs, but instead dynamically plans the trading paths through the design of the intention layer. A user's payment request may involve liquidity scheduling across multiple public chains, but the entire process is transparent to the user and the fees are optimized. This solution somewhat addresses the long-standing "payment convenience" issue in the crypto world.