Why settle for 3-4% when we could hit 20-25%? Economic growth targets seem artificially constrained. The gap between current GDP projections and what's theoretically achievable keeps traders and investors wondering—what's holding back the momentum? When macro conditions shift, so do market dynamics. Stronger growth economics could reshape how assets perform across cycles.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
21 Likes
Reward
21
10
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
DegenDreamer
· 2h ago
You guys really think economic growth is just about the increase in the chain... What are you thinking with the 20-25% figure? Dreaming, right?
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-9f682d4c
· 3h ago
Oh my, hearing 20-25% sounds great, but can it really be that stable to actually get? The macro environment is so complex, it feels like just a paper article again.
View OriginalReply0
GasOptimizer
· 12-14 20:43
3-4% vs 20-25%, is the gap really that big? It depends on the data. Historically, what has been the true sustained growth rate? It's clear when you pull up the Excel sheet; otherwise, it's just armchair strategizing.
View OriginalReply0
ProxyCollector
· 12-14 05:53
Who cares about a 3-4% growth rate? It indeed feels like hitting a ceiling.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationKing
· 12-14 05:53
Oh my god, is 3-4% really enough? I think these economists just haven't experienced the sweet taste of a 20% daily limit increase.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropChaser
· 12-14 05:47
Uh... 20-25%? Give me a break. That sounds as outrageous as some crypto project whitepapers.
View OriginalReply0
StakoorNeverSleeps
· 12-14 05:40
Ha, you're starting to hype again. Who believes in 20-25%... reality will always slap you in the face.
View OriginalReply0
4am_degen
· 12-14 05:39
That's not right. 3-4% is conservative work; the real institutions have long targeted that 20-25% slice. The problem is that the policy makers have been constantly stepping on the brakes.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityOracle
· 12-14 05:37
3-4% targets are really too conservative, but 20-25%? Dude, how did you come up with these numbers?
View OriginalReply0
MEVHunterX
· 12-14 05:23
Starting to dream again, 3-4% to 20-25%? Is this gap really just "theoretically achievable"... or what actually?
Why settle for 3-4% when we could hit 20-25%? Economic growth targets seem artificially constrained. The gap between current GDP projections and what's theoretically achievable keeps traders and investors wondering—what's holding back the momentum? When macro conditions shift, so do market dynamics. Stronger growth economics could reshape how assets perform across cycles.