Taking advantage of this trend, let's talk about DAO owning intellectual property—how exactly does it work?
The example of Aave shows that the IP held by a DAO could be websites, domain names, brands, etc. But expanding further, it could be any form of intellectual property—technology, patents, codebases, or even various assets that the DAO can license out.
This involves several real-world issues: How does a DAO manage these assets? How are governance votes decided regarding the use and licensing of IP? What is the process if a third party wants to obtain a license? How are these IPs represented on-chain?
This is not just a technical issue; it also involves legal, economic models, and organizational design. But once clarified, a DAO can operate assets like a traditional company, and even do so more flexibly and transparently.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
15 Likes
Reward
15
9
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PancakeFlippa
· 12-14 01:55
Honestly, the DAO's IP process is still pretty chaotic. Who really manages to go through the entire voting decision process?
View OriginalReply0
VCsSuckMyLiquidity
· 12-13 19:50
Honestly, this system is still a mess... Governance voting decision IP authorization? Uh, just imagine the scene—thousands of people voting to approve a license, how long would that take?
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 12-13 19:50
According to my analysis, the operational logic of the DAO IP is essentially about moving the legal framework onto the blockchain. In simple terms, it still needs to solve the ultimate question of "how wallet addresses represent IP ownership."
It seems that Aave's approach is just the beginning. The real plot twist should be in patents and technology licensing—whoever controls the voting rights will hold the key to the IP's lifeline. This risk needs to be carefully assessed.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 12-13 19:49
It sounds simple, but in reality, it's a big trap... Governance voting to decide on IP licensing? Then a bunch of holders blindly voting, and you'll really regret it only when problems arise.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSauceMaster
· 12-13 19:44
To be honest, this sounds pretty complicated, but it feels like a bunch of DAOs are still just fumbling around... Voting governance and IP licensing? How efficient would that be, haha.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropLicker
· 12-13 19:43
The DAO's IP aspect is indeed a trap. It seems simple but comes with a bunch of legal issues, and the voting efficiency is painfully slow.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoSourGrape
· 12-13 19:42
Here we go again, with this kind of "once it's clear" talk... If I had already figured it out, why am I still here watching your discussions, right? Those who bought Aave early are now financially free, and I'm here researching IP licensing processes...
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-a5fa8bd0
· 12-13 19:39
To be honest, the DAO IP management framework is still a tangled mess right now. Voting decisions feel too inefficient. Can it really compare to traditional companies?
Taking advantage of this trend, let's talk about DAO owning intellectual property—how exactly does it work?
The example of Aave shows that the IP held by a DAO could be websites, domain names, brands, etc. But expanding further, it could be any form of intellectual property—technology, patents, codebases, or even various assets that the DAO can license out.
This involves several real-world issues: How does a DAO manage these assets? How are governance votes decided regarding the use and licensing of IP? What is the process if a third party wants to obtain a license? How are these IPs represented on-chain?
This is not just a technical issue; it also involves legal, economic models, and organizational design. But once clarified, a DAO can operate assets like a traditional company, and even do so more flexibly and transparently.