【Crypto圈】RaveDAO’s RAVE token has taken an interesting approach—focusing on live concerts and event scenes, which is completely different from most Web3 projects that concentrate on infrastructure development. After launching on ASTER, that $1 trading pair immediately exploded, with many celebrities sharing it, and the price hit new highs. This kind of “celebrity effect” has two sides: on one hand, it can quickly attract attention and funds; on the other hand, once the hype fades, whether these tokens can stabilize remains a big question. After all, history has shown that many celebrity coins are just a flash in the pan.
In contrast, Bitcoin Hyper takes a technical route—claiming to be the first Bitcoin Layer-2 solution, emphasizing faster transactions, lower fees, and offering a 40% annual yield(APY) to attract users. This kind of promise sounds appealing, but in the Web3 world, there’s often a big gap between high returns and real-world adoption, and market validation is still needed.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
24 Likes
Reward
24
7
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TokenVelocity
· 12-15 21:24
Can RAVE skyrocket just because of celebrity endorsements? I've seen this trick too many times. As soon as the hype dies down, the true nature is revealed... I really can't handle that 40% annualized return of Bitcoin Hyper, it's just too outrageous.
View OriginalReply0
LightningPacketLoss
· 12-14 02:34
Celebrity coins are still the same old tricks. Once the hype passes, they collapse. How long RAVE can last this time is really hard to say.
Bitcoin Hyper's 40% APY is just for listening; in Web3, these figures have always been empty promises.
The concert scene is indeed innovative, but what the crypto world has never lacked is creativity.
View OriginalReply0
MindsetExpander
· 12-13 11:09
Celebrities sharing that kind of stuff is really cliché; RAVE is just a hype machine. Bitcoin Hyper's 40% APY... haha, only true bravehearts would dare to believe it.
View OriginalReply0
LeekCutter
· 12-13 11:07
I've seen this celebrity coin routine many times. RAVE relies on celebrities sharing to hype it up, and once the hype dies down, it's just a mess. That's a pattern.
Bitcoin Hyper's 40% APY sounds outrageous. Who would believe it and get cut? I don't touch it.
RAVE's concert concept is somewhat fresh, a bit better than pure hype, but I'm worried it lacks real implementation.
History has proven that coins backed by celebrities mostly die. Just watch.
Wait, ASTER trading pair exploded at just $1? How much capital does that require? Seems fishy.
I just want to ask, are there any truly usable Layer-2 solutions left?
RAVE at least has a scene, although it might also be pumping, but Hyper's high APY? I'm just gonna pass.
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlertBot
· 12-13 11:02
Celebrities sharing causes a surge, but as soon as the hype dissipates, the true nature is revealed... I've seen this RAVE pattern too many times. Let's see if it can survive until next year.
View OriginalReply0
ForkMaster
· 12-13 11:01
Celebrity coins follow the old套路,我见过太多了. RAVE this wave is just betting on hype, the real question is whether the project team has thought about how to survive after the hype.
Bitcoin Hyper's 40% APY is scary, right? I wouldn't dare to play with my three kids' education funds like that, it feels too much like a gambling agreement.
ASTER's launch was explosive, honestly it's still about having the right wealth code, but has the vulnerability been audited? Is the contract code open source?
Both of these are bets—one on celebrity effect, the other on technological faith. In a bear market, let's stay grounded.
To be honest, doing Web3 in concert scenarios is indeed fresh, but whether it can truly land is the real issue.
High APYs need to be carefully scrutinized; not all promises can be fulfilled. I've fallen into enough pits over the years.
For RAVE to really survive, it needs more than just celebrity reposts; otherwise, it's just a quick cash grab.
No matter how loudly Bitcoin Hyper boasts, it has to speak with code. There are many Layer-2 solutions out there, why should we trust yours?
Celebrity coins usually don't last more than two quarters—that's the rule.
That $1 trading pair exploding immediately indicates either a flawed liquidity design or real potential. Need to think it through carefully.
View OriginalReply0
BearMarketSunriser
· 12-13 10:42
I'm too familiar with this celebrity coin scam—just hype it up and run, leaving the last chasers crying and whining.
RAVE tokens hit new highs thanks to celebrity endorsements. Can Bitcoin Hyper Layer-2 break the curse of celebrity coins?
【Crypto圈】RaveDAO’s RAVE token has taken an interesting approach—focusing on live concerts and event scenes, which is completely different from most Web3 projects that concentrate on infrastructure development. After launching on ASTER, that $1 trading pair immediately exploded, with many celebrities sharing it, and the price hit new highs. This kind of “celebrity effect” has two sides: on one hand, it can quickly attract attention and funds; on the other hand, once the hype fades, whether these tokens can stabilize remains a big question. After all, history has shown that many celebrity coins are just a flash in the pan.
In contrast, Bitcoin Hyper takes a technical route—claiming to be the first Bitcoin Layer-2 solution, emphasizing faster transactions, lower fees, and offering a 40% annual yield(APY) to attract users. This kind of promise sounds appealing, but in the Web3 world, there’s often a big gap between high returns and real-world adoption, and market validation is still needed.