BTC. #ETH a few days ago said there would be a big avalanche, who saw it? Who actually went to see what I said? I am not being impulsive, but rather factual. This is hindsight wisdom, not foresight. The market has validated my statement, which proves that shorting is always less risky than going long. So as long as BTC or Ether reaches a high point, when you're told to go long, you should do the opposite. Never go long; just short. When you see others going long, you should do the opposite, provided you don't take a heavy position, but rather add a little bit at a time. The cost of shorting is the lowest because dumping doesn't require much cost, whereas going long requires a significant cost.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
139
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GateUser-a6b17279
· 2025-06-14 17:43
very good
Reply0
XieXingrong
· 2025-06-14 14:08
The ten-thousand times coin money tree plant leading coin has arrived, have you climbed the tree 🌲?
View OriginalReply0
Congxiang413ZhanZhao
· 2025-06-14 11:21
A hundred times the base, a thousand times the expectation! The early dividends of PIJS, miss it and there will be no more, come quickly to seize the opportunity for wealth!
View OriginalReply0
HereamI
· 2025-06-14 10:55
🔥 PIJS Wealth Storm 🌪️
230 million deflationary model × King of Pi Ecological DEX
🚀 Price Leap:
1U (Floor Price) → 10U (To da moon price) → 100U (Stellar price)
💎 Triple Momentum:
✅ Deflationary burn mechanism
✅ Full-chain trading hub
✅ Million Consensus Legion
⚡ Immediate execution:
Buy|stake|Evangelism
View OriginalReply0
Sfmo
· 2025-06-14 10:14
Buy To Earn 💎
Reply0
BlackCatSheriffA
· 2025-06-14 04:27
Add bit by bit. The shorting cost is the lowest because dumping does not require much cost, while going long requires a large cost.
BTC. #ETH a few days ago said there would be a big avalanche, who saw it? Who actually went to see what I said? I am not being impulsive, but rather factual. This is hindsight wisdom, not foresight. The market has validated my statement, which proves that shorting is always less risky than going long. So as long as BTC or Ether reaches a high point, when you're told to go long, you should do the opposite. Never go long; just short. When you see others going long, you should do the opposite, provided you don't take a heavy position, but rather add a little bit at a time. The cost of shorting is the lowest because dumping doesn't require much cost, whereas going long requires a significant cost.