
A Decentralized Autonomous Organization (DAO) is an organization collectively governed by its community according to transparent blockchain-based rules.
In a DAO, the organization's "charter" is encoded into smart contracts—self-executing programs that enforce rules without relying on a single authority. Members typically hold governance tokens or specific NFTs, which grant them the right to propose initiatives and vote on decisions such as fund allocation, protocol upgrades, or community policies. DAO funds are held in on-chain "treasuries," with disbursement controlled by multi-signature wallets or smart contracts. Multi-signature (multi-sig) arrangements require approval from multiple participants to authorize transactions, functioning like a digital safe that only opens with several keys.
DAOs shape the direction of many leading crypto protocols, so understanding them helps you assess project risks and opportunities.
In DeFi, decisions about fee structures, token incentives, and protocol upgrades are often made through DAO voting—for example, whether Uniswap should enable fee sharing or how MakerDAO configures reserve assets. Participating in a DAO can also provide rewards and funding opportunities for contributions like tool development, documentation, or technical tasks, with payments coming directly from the treasury. For everyday investors, understanding DAOs helps answer key questions such as "Who makes decisions?" and "How are funds spent?"—insights critical to interpreting token price movements.
The operation of a DAO typically involves four stages: membership qualification, proposal submission, voting, and execution.
Membership is generally determined by holding governance tokens or NFTs. Governance tokens grant voting rights—usually proportional to token holdings—though some DAOs adopt a one-person-one-vote approach based on addresses.
A proposal is a formal suggestion submitted to the community for discussion. Common proposals include budget allocations, parameter adjustments, and listing or delisting of assets. Proposals are displayed on governance forums and voting platforms with specified start and end times for voting.
Voting is conducted using tools like Snapshot or on-chain voting mechanisms. Snapshot records off-chain snapshots of token balances for voting without incurring gas fees, while on-chain voting directly changes smart contract states, enabling automatic execution of results. Many DAOs use Snapshot for initial polling and then execute decisions via on-chain contracts.
Execution and security are managed by smart contracts or multi-sig wallets. Approved proposals enter an execution queue; smart contracts disburse funds or update parameters per defined rules, while multi-sigs require signatures from designated signers for transfers. To prevent misuse, DAOs often implement quorum requirements, passing thresholds, and time locks—a waiting period before execution that allows for community oversight and error correction.
DAOs are most prevalent in protocol governance, ecosystem funding, community management, and public goods initiatives.
In DeFi governance, UniswapDAO uses the UNI governance token to vote on fee structures and governance frameworks; MakerDAO members vote on collateral parameters and reserve asset allocation, impacting DAI’s stability and yield sources.
For ecosystem funding, ArbitrumDAO launches incentive programs to support protocols and developers, driving on-chain activity. Gitcoin leverages quadratic funding to amplify small donations for open-source projects and public goods.
In community management, ENSDAO oversees .eth domain revenues and the public treasury, determining renewal strategies and infrastructure grants to ensure the sustainability of the domain system.
On exchanges like Gate, users often purchase governance tokens (such as UNI, ARB, or ENS), transfer them to self-custody wallets, and participate in voting. Voting outcomes directly influence protocol parameters and treasury flows, which in turn impact token economics and ecosystem vitality. Gate also lists DAO-related tokens and hosts events that help users bridge trading with governance participation.
Participation typically involves preparation, voting, and long-term contribution:
Step 1: Purchase governance tokens on Gate. Select a protocol of interest (e.g., UNI, ARB, ENS), complete your purchase on Gate, and familiarize yourself with voting rules and snapshot requirements.
Step 2: Transfer tokens to your own wallet. Move your tokens to an address you control (such as a common browser wallet). The wallet manages your on-chain identity; many voting mechanisms determine eligibility based on address snapshots.
Step 3: Connect to a voting platform. Visit Snapshot or an on-chain voting site, connect your wallet, and find the relevant DAO space or governance portal. Snapshot offers low-cost polling; on-chain voting triggers direct changes to contract states.
Step 4: Review proposals and join discussions. Enter the governance forum to read proposal texts, budget breakdowns, and execution plans. Pay special attention to details like “quorum,” “passing thresholds,” and “execution methods” to understand implementation.
Step 5: Vote or delegate your vote. Cast your vote directly or delegate your voting power to a more experienced representative. Delegation allows someone else to vote on your behalf while you retain ownership of your assets. When choosing a delegate, review their past voting records and positions.
Step 6: Monitor execution and risks. Verify if proposals are executed as scheduled by checking multi-sig addresses or contract records. Be aware of risks such as governance being dominated by large holders, contract vulnerabilities, or budget misuse. Avoid keeping all your assets at one address for extended periods.
Recently, DAOs have seen growth in treasury size, funding capacity, and voting activity, along with increased focus on compliance and execution efficiency.
Regarding treasury size, public dashboards (such as DeepDAO) showed that by Q3 2025, leading DAOs collectively managed assets exceeding $10 billion—a significant increase over 2024—driven by market recovery and higher protocol revenues.
In terms of funding capacity, ArbitrumDAO distributed over 100 million ARB across multiple incentive rounds this year (valued in the hundreds of millions of USD). Gitcoin matched over $20 million in public goods grants during several rounds this year, supporting developer tools, education initiatives, and data infrastructure.
For voting activity, Snapshot data indicates continuous growth in new spaces and active proposals over the past six months. Many DAOs have shifted important proposals to on-chain execution to resolve issues where off-chain approvals failed to translate into action. Typical voter participation rates range from 5%–15%, with projects using delegation and incentives to boost engagement.
On compliance and organizational structure, more DAOs are adopting foundations or associations as legal wrappers to clarify treasury custody and tax handling. Execution models are evolving from pure multi-sig setups toward combinations of multi-sig wallets, time locks, and on-chain governance contracts—enhancing transparency and operational security.
DAOs differ significantly from traditional companies in power structure, execution method, transparency, and legal relationships.
Power Structure: In companies, shareholders elect directors and managers who make decisions; in DAOs, members holding tokens or NFTs vote directly on matters according to transparent rules.
Execution Method: Companies rely on people to drive processes and sign contracts; DAOs automate execution via smart contracts or multi-sig wallets, reducing human intervention.
Transparency: Company financials are typically private; DAO treasuries and fund disbursements are publicly visible on-chain for ongoing community oversight.
Legal & Employment Framework: Companies have clear employment contracts and regulatory frameworks; DAOs often operate with task-based bounties. Legal wrappers such as foundations or associations are commonly used for compliance but require attention to local tax and regulatory obligations.
Risks: Company risk centers around management decisions and business operations; DAOs face challenges like governance concentration, contract vulnerabilities, and execution delays. Understanding these differences helps you choose the right participation method and risk tolerance.


