“In the crypto world, every price movement results from the interplay of countless factors; attributing it to a single cause may detract from the true analysis.” This industry-wide understanding was upended by the recent volatility of the WLFI token.

After World Liberty Financial’s WLFI token was listed, its price saw pronounced swings. Market chatter quickly blamed Justin Sun, the founder of TRON, but the latest on-chain data and expert analysis reveal that this narrative is an oversimplification.

Timestamps: Transfers Occurred After the Drop

On September 6 (UTC), Alex Svanevik, CEO of blockchain analytics platform Nansen, used AI Research Agent to scrutinize WLFI transaction timestamps. His findings showed that Justin Sun was not responsible for dumping the token, overturning the initial assumptions. While AI Research Agent initially flagged Justin Sun as a possible seller of WLFI, deeper analysis of the on-chain timestamps told a different story.

Svanevik further noted that these related transfers actually took place after the WLFI token had already experienced its sharp decline; therefore, they could not be considered the main cause. Given the day’s total trading volume and the size of these transfers, their scale was unlikely to materially impact the market price.

WLFI’s tokenomics are designed in a way that naturally creates early token unlock pressure. The token distribution is highly concentrated: around 83% of the supply is controlled by entities linked to the Trump family and early major holders. Such concentration limits initial market liquidity, making large token unlocks a significant source of price pressure.

Even during the sell-off, blockchain analytics platform Bubblemaps found that among over 85,000 presale participants, 60% still held their tokens and only 29% had fully exited positions. This points to continued investor confidence. Some early investors taking profit is standard behavior in crypto markets, especially when a project has attracted strong attention and seen early price rallies.

The World Liberty Financial team’s decision to block Justin Sun’s wallet has sparked a deeper debate about the core values of decentralized finance. Unilaterally freezing user assets runs counter to blockchain’s foundational principle: private ownership of digital assets should remain sacred and inviolable.

This centralized response highlights a core contradiction facing many crypto projects: while decentralization is the public ideal, centralized control is often retained in practice. In response, Justin Sun emphasized: “A great financial brand should be built on fairness, transparency, and trust—not on freezing investors’ assets.”

Market Misreadings and Media Biases

After WLFI’s price volatility, some media outlets demonstrated clear selectivity and bias, overlooking basic fact-checking and relying on unverified external sources. Blockchain data shows that during the so-called “sell-off,” Justin Sun was actually conducting small deposit tests—not offloading large holdings. These test transactions were misconstrued as dumping activity, triggering unnecessary market panic.

All addresses mentioned in online rumors (previously flagged by Arkham with low confidence, since corrected) belonged to HTX exchange hot wallets and were not connected to Justin Sun personally. The transfers in question were routine market maker actions—borrowing tokens from HTX and reallocating them to Binance to balance liquidity across trading venues.

WLFI’s listing came as the broader crypto market was undergoing a major correction. Leading cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin and Ethereum also declined, and market sentiment turned largely cautious. Against this backdrop, newly listed tokens faced even greater downward pressure—a normal phenomenon under such conditions.

As WLFI’s ecosystem continues to expand, market sentiment is expected to return to rationality. Awareness will grow that WLFI’s true value lies not in short-term price volatility but in the long-term development of its financial ecosystem. As more use cases come online and the ecosystem matures, this episode will become a footnote in WLFI’s ongoing story—a reminder of the complexity and interplay of factors in crypto markets.

Statement:

1. This article is republished from [BlockBeats], with all copyrights belonging to the original author [BlockBeats]. For any concerns regarding this republication, please contact the Gate Learn team; we will address all such feedback promptly in line with our procedures.
2. Disclaimer: The opinions expressed in this article are solely those of the author and do not constitute financial or investment advice.
3. Other language versions of this article are translated by the Gate Learn team and may not be copied, distributed, or plagiarized without expressly referencing Gate.