Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Just looked into something that surprised me: if you're making $100K a year, where does that actually put you? Turns out the answer is way more complicated than I thought.
So here's the thing - individually, $100K puts you well above the median (around $53K), but you're nowhere near top earner territory. The top 1% is sitting at like $450K+. But when you look at households, the picture changes. Apparently around 43% of US households make $100K or more, which means if you're at that level, you're roughly in the 57th percentile. Not bad, but also not "made it" territory.
According to Pew Research, for a 3-person household, middle income ranges from about $56K to $170K. So $100K? That's solidly middle class. You're comfortable, definitely above average, but also not rich by any stretch.
Here's what gets me though - location changes everything. In San Francisco or NYC, $100K gets eaten up by rent and childcare. But in the Midwest or rural areas? That's actually solid upper-middle income. Same number, completely different reality.
Bottom line: how many people in the US make 100K a year is a relevant question because it shows you're doing better than most, but the six-figure thing doesn't mean what it used to. You're comfortable, sure. But you're not in the wealth tier. Just depends where you live and who you're supporting.