Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Report: Chinese Residents' Financial Literacy Rises for Three Consecutive Years, AI's Effectiveness in Improving Decision-Making Quality Still Needs Enhancement
Why is the rate of setting long-term financial goals decreasing despite improvements in financial literacy?
On March 25, Shanghai Gaojin and Charles Schwab Wealth Management jointly released the fourth annual “China Resident Financial Literacy Report,” which shows that the overall financial literacy score of Chinese residents has increased for three consecutive years. However, long-term awareness remains a major weakness in Chinese residents’ financial literacy. Only 44% of respondents set long-term financial goals, a decrease of nearly 8 percentage points from last year. The score in the financial planning dimension has fallen to a three-year low.
The report also indicates that financial service institutions have actively integrated AI into front, middle, and back-office scenarios such as client outreach, risk control compliance, and operational support. However, applications in investor education are still in the early stages. At the same time, there is still significant room for improvement in AI’s accuracy in providing information and its effectiveness in helping investors improve decision-making quality: among residents who regretted following AI investment advice, 69% believed the information provided by AI was inaccurate, affecting their investment judgments; subjective feedback from institutions shows that 14% and 68% of investors experienced significant and slight improvements in knowledge after receiving AI-based financial education, respectively, but they also admitted that the actual effectiveness of AI financial education is currently difficult to evaluate in a quantifiable and comparable manner. (Reporter Sun Mingwei, The Paper)