Futures
Access hundreds of perpetual contracts
TradFi
Gold
One platform for global traditional assets
Options
Hot
Trade European-style vanilla options
Unified Account
Maximize your capital efficiency
Demo Trading
Introduction to Futures Trading
Learn the basics of futures trading
Futures Events
Join events to earn rewards
Demo Trading
Use virtual funds to practice risk-free trading
Launch
CandyDrop
Collect candies to earn airdrops
Launchpool
Quick staking, earn potential new tokens
HODLer Airdrop
Hold GT and get massive airdrops for free
Launchpad
Be early to the next big token project
Alpha Points
Trade on-chain assets and earn airdrops
Futures Points
Earn futures points and claim airdrop rewards
Charles Hoskinson Urges Decentralization of Voting in Liqwid DAO
In a livestream broadcast on March 15th, Charles Hoskinson, founder of Cardano, expressed his concern about a conflict of interest in the governance process of Liqwid DAO. The main focus of his speech was the need for internal participants to abstain from voting on decisions that could directly benefit them, a fundamental principle to maintain integrity in decentralized processes.
The Controversy Surrounding NIGHT Distribution
The core issue involves the allocation of NIGHT tokens, linked to the ADA market on the Liqwid platform. The fund in question is valued at nearly $1 million, with approximately 18.81 million tokens involved. Hoskinson strongly argued that insiders should not participate in decisions that could favor their own positions.
Charles Hoskinson’s Stance on Governance
According to the perspective shared by the Cardano founder, the final decision regarding the distribution of these tokens should rest solely with the NIGHT holders, ensuring a fair vote free of conflicts of interest. This position reflects a commitment to the decentralization principles that characterize the Cardano ecosystem.
Why This Position Matters
Charles Hoskinson’s intervention highlights the importance of maintaining high standards of transparency and fairness in the governance processes of decentralized autonomous organizations. When insiders participate in votes affecting their own interests, there is a risk of compromising the legitimacy of collective decisions—a critical challenge that any decentralized protocol must face. Hoskinson’s perspective aims to strengthen trust in the governance mechanisms of the Cardano ecosystem.