Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
WLD surges 40% in a single day, reigniting the digital identity track
On the morning of January 29th, Worldcoin (WLD) suddenly experienced an extremely unusual market movement. Within just a few hours, the price rapidly surged from around $0.46 to a high of $0.64, with intraday gains exceeding 40%. Even after a subsequent pullback, as of press time, WLD remained around $0.55, with a daily increase of approximately 20%.
This surge was not triggered by technical patterns or liquidity anomalies. What truly ignited market sentiment was a rumor about OpenAI. The reason this rumor caused such a strong reaction is not simply the “partnership” itself, but because it touched upon a recurring real-world issue: when AI can mass-produce “human-like” accounts, how should the internet re-verify human existence?
Not just another social platform, but a fundamental logic experiment
According to Forbes, citing anonymous sources, there is currently a small internal team of fewer than 10 people at OpenAI working on an early-stage social networking project. Unlike existing platforms, this product does not attempt to innovate in content formats or interaction mechanisms. Its core focus is solely on one question: in an environment flooded with AI-generated content, how can we re-establish a credible boundary for “real users”?
The report states that OpenAI is evaluating multiple “real identity verification” solutions, including Worldcoin’s Orb iris scanning device and Apple’s Face ID technology. The goal is not traditional real-name registration or account binding, but to verify a more fundamental question—whether the account corresponds to a real and unique human individual.
If this direction is true, it means OpenAI is not just developing a new social app, but trying to introduce a new underlying premise for social networks in the AI era.
Why Worldcoin is the first to come to market’s mind
Worldcoin is repeatedly mentioned, and not by chance. One of its co-founders is Sam Altman, the co-founder and CEO of OpenAI. Although his current main focus remains on OpenAI, this connection makes it difficult for the market to see Worldcoin as an “unrelated third-party solution.”
From its inception, Worldcoin has aimed to build a global “proof of human uniqueness” system, not just a token project. While this goal seemed advanced or even radical in the early days, it has begun to show practical significance after the widespread adoption of generative AI.
Therefore, when the market interprets this rumor, the focus is not just on “whether there is a partnership,” but on whether OpenAI has started seriously considering identity-layer issues, and whether Worldcoin is precisely at the intersection of this problem.
After AI proliferation, social networks are losing the “human” boundary
In the past, fake accounts were mostly low-quality bots or marketing armies, and detection was relatively straightforward. But after the maturity of generative AI, the situation has fundamentally changed. Today’s fake accounts can simulate emotions, opinions, and behavioral rhythms, participate in public discussions, create false consensus, and even exert real influence on financial markets and public opinion.
Traditional responses include real-name systems or KYC, but these approaches face clear issues. On one hand, they require users to surrender large amounts of personal privacy; on the other hand, they make platforms highly centralized data nodes, increasing privacy risks and regulatory pressures.
In this context, “real human identity verification” is being reconsidered. It does not aim to answer “who are you,” but only to verify one thing: whether you are a real, single human being.
Differences between iris scanning and Face ID
Worldcoin’s Orb device generates a World ID through iris scanning, creating an irreversible cryptographic identifier. The project emphasizes that original biometric data is not stored but transformed into a mathematical proof to ensure “one person, one ID.”
This method’s advantage lies in its high degree of uniqueness. The iris structure is highly complex and, in theory, nearly impossible to replicate, making it well-suited as a foundational verification of “human uniqueness.”
In contrast, Face ID’s advantage is its widespread adoption. Hundreds of millions of users already use this technology daily, with very low access barriers. However, whether it can meet the needs of cross-platform, non-replicable registration, and long-term as an underlying identity infrastructure, remains a topic of discussion.
This is the core divergence behind the two approaches: the trade-off between convenience and uniqueness.
What WLD’s rise indicates about market expectations
The rapid surge in WLD is essentially not about trading a piece of news, but about trading a possibility. If a new identity standard is truly needed in the AI era, the earliest adopted solutions by mainstream platforms will naturally possess strong network effects.
Once digital identity becomes infrastructure, it is difficult to replace. Unlike ordinary applications that can be easily migrated, it will form a long-term lock-in within the ecosystem.
From this perspective, the market is not necessarily betting that Worldcoin will succeed, but whether it has the chance to become a “standard candidate.”
Regulatory and practical challenges remain
Of course, this path is not without difficulties. Worldcoin has faced biometric data regulatory scrutiny in several countries, with some regions suspending the promotion of Orb devices. The costs, speed, and global coverage of deploying physical devices are unavoidable practical challenges.
For OpenAI, whether to deeply involve itself in a global identity layer system also involves complex political, legal, and social considerations.
The recent rise of WLD may recede as emotions fade, but the issues it points to will not disappear. As AI begins to participate in internet activities like humans, proving “who is a real person” will no longer be a philosophical debate but an engineering problem that must be solved.
Whether Worldcoin will become the answer remains uncertain, but one thing is clear: digital identity is moving from a fringe topic in the crypto world to a core issue of the AI era.