Currently, the competition among Layer 1 public chains often boils down to a TPS number game. But have you ever thought—no matter how many transactions are processed per second, if the architecture itself doesn't understand AI, it's all pointless.



The era is shifting. Previously, public chains hurriedly patched their existing frameworks and slapped AI labels on them. But there's a fatal flaw in doing so: AI is not an ornament; it cannot be forcibly retrofitted later. True competitiveness lies in—being born for AI from day one of design.

Vanar Chain is taking this very path. It's not just about speed; it's directly injecting AI operational logic into the underlying protocol. Data storage? It handles that. Data transmission? It handles that too. But more critically—data understanding and reasoning? That's where Vanar truly puts in effort. You could say this is a difference at the genetic level; no matter how old chains are transformed, they can't catch up.

At this point, what does "AI-ready" really mean? It's not just about stacking transaction volume. It's about infrastructure having native memory, reasoning capabilities, automated execution, plus a clear settlement mechanism. These are not add-on features—they are the lifeblood of the infrastructure. Vanar proves to the market through a set of implemented product matrices that this approach is genuinely feasible.
VANRY-4,5%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
LayerZeroHerovip
· 4h ago
The TPS number game should have ended long ago, but I'm just worried there are still people frantically stacking numbers there. AI is inherently part of the architecture; patches later? Haha, isn't that just paper-thin? Getting the underlying logic right is truly powerful; everything else is just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-6bc33122vip
· 4h ago
Uh... I've heard the term TPS number game too many times, honestly it's a bit tiring. However, the concept of AI-native is a new idea, but can Vanar truly be implemented? We'll have to see the results to be convinced.
View OriginalReply0
OPsychologyvip
· 4h ago
It's the same old TPS number game again; the core is still designing the architecture from scratch for AI.
View OriginalReply0
CryptoDouble-O-Sevenvip
· 4h ago
Listen up, TPS numbers in digital gaming have been around for so many years, and no one has really figured it out. AI native vs. post-implementation patching, this difference truly is heaven and hell. When it comes to the foundational logic injection, how do other chains compare?
View OriginalReply0
PaperHandsCriminalvip
· 4h ago
Huh? Here we go again talking about AI readiness... I just want to ask, which public chain isn't labeled with AI now? It's almost standard, but the key is whether it can actually be used.
View OriginalReply0
SorryRugPulledvip
· 4h ago
It's AI and foundational technology again. When it comes down to actually using it, it's still the same old story. No matter how impressive the hype, the results have to speak for themselves.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityLarryvip
· 4h ago
Another story of "Our Native AI," is it really true this time?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)